Abstract
AbstractIn the initial phase of the COVID-19 pandemic, Sweden’s response stood out as an exception. For example, Sweden did not introduce any lockdowns, while many other countries did. In this paper I take the Swedish Corona Commission’s critique of the initial Swedish response as a point of departure for a general analysis of precaution in relation to pandemics. The Commission points out that in contrast to many other countries Sweden did not follow ‘the precautionary principle’. Based on this critique, the Commission proposes that the precautionary principle should be included among Sweden’s guiding principles for crisis management. However, as the debate on this principle during the last 30 years indicates, the principle is loaded with problems. I discuss one of these problems, namely its lack of clarity. I argue, however, that this problem is not unsurmountable. A principle is lacking clarity precisely by being a principle and not a rule with a well-defined meaning. As a principle it indicates a direction but does not prescribe a specific action. However, to be action-guiding its content needs to be specified by rational deliberation. With this in mind, I propose a framework for specification of the precautionary principle as applied to pandemics. The framework focuses on the principle’s four key elements: threat, uncertainty, action and responsibility. I also suggest certain general ethical restrictions on specification.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Health Policy,Education,Health (social science)
Reference26 articles.
1. Arcuri, Alessandra. 2007. Reconstructing precaution, deconstructing misconceptions. Ethics and International Affairs 21 (3): 359–379.
2. Birch, Jonathan. 2021. Applying the Precautionary Principle to Pandemics. https://philarchive.org/archive/BIRATP. Accessed 13 January 2023.
3. Commission of the European Communities. 2000. Communication from the Commission on the precautionary principle. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/21676661-a79f-4153-b984-aeb28f07c80a/language-en. Accessed 13 January 2023.
4. Coronakommissionen. 2022. Sverige under pandemin. Volym 1 och 2 (SOU 2022:10). Stockholm. https://coronakommissionen.com/publikationer/slutbetankande-sou-2022-10/ Accessed 13 January 2023.
5. Fisher, Elisabeth. 2002. Precaution, precaution everywhere: developing a ‘Common understanding’ of the Precautionary Principle in the European Community. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 9: 7.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. How to deal with risks of AI suffering;Inquiry;2023-07-22
2. Precaution;Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy;2023-05-01