Abstract
AbstractThe datafication and digitalization of health and medicine has engendered a proliferation of new collaborations between public health institutions and data corporations like Google, Apple, Microsoft and Amazon. Critical perspectives on these new partnerships tend to frame them as an instance of market transgressions by tech giants into the sphere of health and medicine, in line with a “hostile worlds” doctrine that upholds that the borders between market and non-market spheres should be carefully policed. This article seeks to outline the limitations of this common framing for critically understanding the phenomenon of the Googlization of health. In particular, the mobilization of a diversity of non-market value statements in the justification work carried out by actors involved in the Googlization of health indicates the co-presence of additional worlds or spheres in this context, which are not captured by the market vs. non-market dichotomy. It then advances an alternative framework, based on a multiple-sphere ontology that draws on Boltanski and Thevenot’s orders of worth and Michael Walzer’s theory of justice, which I call a normative pragmatics of justice. This framework addresses both the normative deficit in Boltanski and Thevenot’s work and provides an important emphasis on the empirical workings of justice. Finally, I discuss why this framework is better equipped to identify and to address the many risks raised by the Googlization of health and possibly other dimensions of the digitalization and datafication of society.
Funder
H2020 European Research Council
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Health Policy,Education,Health(social science)
Reference83 articles.
1. Ajana, B. 2017. Digital health and the biopolitics of the Quantified Self. Digital Health 3: 1–18.
2. Anderson, E. 1990a. The ethical limitations of the market. Economics & Philosophy 6: 179–205.
3. Anderson, E. 1990b. Is women’s labor a commodity? Philosophy & Public Affairs 19: 71–92.
4. Anderson, E. 1995. Values in Ethics and Economics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
5. Apple, n.d. https://www.apple.com/lae/researchkit/. Accessed 19 December 2020.
Cited by
30 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献