Abstract
AbstractMany experts have emphasised that chatbots are not sufficiently mature to be able to technically diagnose patient conditions or replace the judgements of health professionals. The COVID-19 pandemic, however, has significantly increased the utilisation of health-oriented chatbots, for instance, as a conversational interface to answer questions, recommend care options, check symptoms and complete tasks such as booking appointments. In this paper, we take a proactive approach and consider how the emergence of task-oriented chatbots as partially automated consulting systems can influence clinical practices and expert–client relationships. We suggest the need for new approaches in professional ethics as the large-scale deployment of artificial intelligence may revolutionise professional decision-making and client–expert interaction in healthcare organisations. We argue that the implementation of chatbots amplifies the project of rationality and automation in clinical practice and alters traditional decision-making practices based on epistemic probability and prudence. This article contributes to the discussion on the ethical challenges posed by chatbots from the perspective of healthcare professional ethics.
Funder
Ella ja Georg Ehrnroothin Säätiö
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Health Policy,Education,Health(social science)
Reference59 articles.
1. Abd-Alrazaq, A., Z. Safi, M. Alajlani, J. Warren, M. Househ, and K. Denecke. 2020. Technical metrics used to evaluate health care chatbots: scoping review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 22 (6): 1–15.
2. Accenture Consulting. 2018. Artificial intelligence, genuine impact public services in the era of artificial intelligence. https://www.accenture.com/_acnmedia/pdf-75/accenture-ai-genuine-impact-pov-final-us.pdf. Accessed 15 January 2021.
3. AlgorithmWatch. 2020. Automated Decision-Making Systems in the COVID-19 Pandemic: A European perspective. Automating society report 2020. https://automatingsociety.algorithmwatch.org/. Accessed 15 January 2021.
4. Aristotle. 1926. Nicomachean Ethics. Trans. H. Rackham. Loeb Classical Library 73. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. https://www.loebclassics.com/view/LCL073/1926/volume.xml. Accessed 15 January 2021.
5. Atique, S., J.R. Bautista, L.J. Block, J.J. Lee, E. Lozada-Perezmitre, R. Nibber, S. O’Connor, L.-M. Peltonen, C. Ronquillo, J. Tayaben, F.J.S. Thilo, and M. Topaz. 2020. A Nursing informatics response to COVID-19: Perspectives from five regions of the world. Journal of Advanced Nursing 76 (10): 2462–2468.
Cited by
57 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献