Abstract
AbstractIn everyday conversations, professional codes, policy debates, and academic literature, the concept of respect is referred to frequently. Bioethical arguments in recent decades equate the idea of respect for persons with individuals who are capable of autonomous decision-making, with the focus being explicitly on ‘autonomy,’ ‘capacity,’ or ‘capability.’ In much of bioethics literature, respect for persons is replaced by respect for autonomy. Though the unconditional respect for persons and their autonomy (irrespective of actual decision-making capacity) is established in Kantian bioethics, current argument and debates often revolve around a thin concept of autonomy, focusing on capacity and capability: persons are owed respect because they are ‘rational beings’ or with a focus on ‘agency’ and ‘decision-making abilities.’ However, these aspects alone are insufficient while engaging the concept of respect for persons, particularly in healthcare settings. This paper sets out to explore if the concept of respect for persons—as opposed to a thin concept of autonomy—could help us engage better in healthcare practices. We shall probe the practical value of the experiential aspect of respect—understood as the recognition of persons as respect-worthy through certain dispositions and deliberative acts—by reflecting on instances in clinical practice that tend to be dismissed as negligible or even unavoidable in a stressful environment such as a busy hospital. We shall argue that these instances are far from trivial but carry moral significance and express an unacceptable—disrespectful—attitude that can compromise the moral habitus in hospital settings. In our conclusion, we call for practicing recognition respect in the health professional–patient encounter by focussing on manners, attitudes, and behaviors. Furthermore, we call for continuous medical ethics education programs to address the moral significance of disrespectful behaviors and their manifestations in particular socio-cultural contexts.
Funder
University Grants Commission
Swiss Government Excellence Scholarship
Stehr-Boldt Fellowship Award, University of Zurich
University of Zurich
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Health Policy,Education,Health (social science)
Reference67 articles.
1. Aboumatar, Hanan, Mary Catherine Beach, Ting Yang, Emily Branyon, Lindsay Forbes, and Jeremy Sugarman. 2015a. Measuring patients’ experiences of respect and dignity in the intensive care unit: A pilot study. Narrative Inquiry in Bioethics 5: 69A-84A. https://doi.org/10.1353/nib.2015.0005.
2. Aboumatar, Hanan, Lindsay Forbes, Emily Branyon, Joseph Carrese, Gail Geller, Mary Catherine Beach, and Jeremy Sugarman. 2015b. Understanding treatment with respect and dignity in the intensive care unit. Narrative Inquiry in Bioethics 5: 55A-67A. https://doi.org/10.1353/nib.2015.0003.
3. Árnason, Vilhjálmur. 2021. In defense of dignity: Reflections on the moral function of human dignity. Bioethics 35: 31–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12826.
4. Aronson, Joshua, Diana Burgess, Sean M. Phelan, and Lindsay Juarez. 2012. Unhealthy interactions: The role of stereotype threat in health disparities. American Journal of Public Health 103: 50–56. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2012.300828.
5. Baru, Rama, Arnab Acharya, A.K. Sanghmitra Acharya, Shiva Kumar, and K. Nagaraj. 2010. Inequities in access to health services in India: Caste, class and region. Economic and Political Weekly 45 (38): 49–58.
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献