Abstract
AbstractIn this article, we analyse how researchers use the categories of race and ethnicity with reference to genetics and genomics. We show that there is still considerable conceptual “messiness” (despite the wide-ranging and popular debate on the subject) when it comes to the use of ethnoracial categories in genetics and genomics that among other things makes it difficult to properly compare and interpret research using ethnoracial categories, as well as draw conclusions from them. Finally, we briefly reconstruct some of the biases of reductionism to which geneticists (as well as other researchers referring to genetic methods and explanations) are particularly exposed to, and we analyse the problem in the context of the biologization of ethnoracial categories. Our work constitutes a novel, in-depth contribution to the debate about reporting race and ethnicity in biomedical and health research. First, we reconstruct the theoretical background assumptions about racial ontology which researchers implicitly presume in their studies with the aid of a sample of recent papers published in medical journals about COVID-19. Secondly, we use the typology of the biases of reductionism to the problem of biologization of ethnoracial categories with reference to genetics and genomics.
Funder
Narodowe Centrum Nauki
H2020 European Research Council
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Health Policy,Education,Health (social science)
Reference106 articles.
1. Ali, H., A. Alshukry, S.K. Marafie, M. AlRukhayes, Y. Ali, M.B. Abbas, et al. 2021. Outcomes of COVID-19: Disparities by ethnicity. Infection, Genetics and Evolution 87: 104639.
2. Appiah, K.A. 1996. Reconstructing racial identities. Research in African Literatures 27 (3): 68–72.
3. Ayala, F.J. 1987. Biological reductionism. In Self-organizing systems, ed. F.E. Yates, A. Garfinkel, D.O. Walter, and G.B. Yates, 315–324. Boston, MA: Springer.
4. Bechtel, W., and R. Richardson. 1993. Discovering complexity: Decomposition and localization as scientific research strategies. Princeton University Press: Princeton.
5. Bhala, N., G. Curry, A.R. Martineau, C. Agyemang, and R. Bhopal. 2020. Sharpening the global focus on ethnicity and race in the time of COVID-19. The Lancet 395 (10238): 1673–1676.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Uses and abuses of the concept of race in genomics of sport performance and sport-related traumatic brain injury: epistemological and ethical considerations;Sport, Ethics and Philosophy;2024-06-06
2. Let’s talk about the ghosts in the room: the haunting language of biological differences
Haunting biology: science and indigeneity in Australia
, by Emma Kowal, Durham & London, Duke University Press, 2023, 264 pp., $27.95 (Paperback), ISBN: 978-1-4780-2537-5, $104.95 (hardcover), ISBN: 978-1-4780-2059-2.;Journal of Political Power;2024-05-02
3. Towards the multileveled and processual conceptualisation of racialised individuals in biomedical research;Synthese;2022-12-28