Euthanasia: agreeing to disagree?-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Euthanasia: agreeing to disagree?

Published:2010-07-31 Issue:4 Volume:13 Page:399-402
ISSN:1386-7423
Container-title:Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy
language:en
Short-container-title:Med Health Care and Philos

Author:

Holm Søren

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Health Policy,Education,Health (social science)

Link

http://www.springerlink.com/index/pdf/10.1007/s11019-010-9264-1

Reference12 articles.

1. Doctors who refuse euthanasia ‘wicked’, expert claims. News Letter, 06.01.2009 http://www.newsletter.co.uk/news/Ignoring-a-death-wish-is.4845993.jp .

2. Guttman, Amy. 1993. Democracy. In A companion to contemporary political philosophy, ed. R.E. Goodin, and P. Pettit, 411–421. Oxford: Blackwell.

3. Guttman, Amy, and Denis Thompson. 1990. Moral conflict and political consensus. Ethics 101: 64–88.

4. Habermas, Jürgen. 1992. Faktizität und Geltung. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

5. Habermas, Jürgen. 1995. Reconciliation through the public use of reasons: Remarks on John Rawls’s political liberalism. Journal of Philosophy 92: 109–131.

Cited by 12 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. License to Kill: A New Model for Excusing Medically Assisted Dying?;New Directions in the Ethics of Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia;2023

2. Voluntary assisted dying in Victoria, Australia;Regulating the End of Life;2021-07-16

3. In Defence of Moral Pluralism and Compromise in Health Care Networks;Health Care Analysis;2018-03-29

4. Accelerating the public’s learning curve on wicked policy issues: results from deliberative forums on euthanasia;Policy Sciences;2015-06-23

5. License to Kill: A New Model for Excusing Medically Assisted Dying?;New Directions in the Ethics of Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia;2015