Abstract
AbstractSome of Michel Foucault’s work focusses on an archeological and genealogical analysis of certain aspects of the medical episteme, such as ‘Madness and Civilization’ (1964/2001), ‘The Birth of the Clinic’ (1973) and ‘The History of Sexuality’ (1978/2020a). These and other Foucauldian works have often been invoked to characterize, but also to normatively interpret mechanisms of the currently existing medical episteme. Writers conclude that processes of patient objectification, power, medicalization, observation and discipline are widespread in various areas where the medical specialty operates and that these aspects have certain normative implications for how our society operates or should operate. The Foucauldian concepts used to describe the medical episteme and the normative statements surrounding these concepts will be critically analyzed in this paper.By using Foucault’s work and several of his interpreters, I will focus on the balance between processes of subjectification and objectification and the normative implications of these processes by relating Foucault’s work and the work of his interpreters to the current medical discipline. Additionally, by focusing on the discussion of death and biopower, the role of physicians in the negation and stigmatization of death is being discussed, mainly through the concept of biopower. Lastly, based on the discussion of panopticism in the medical discipline, this paper treats negative and positive forms power, and a focus will be laid upon forms of resistance against power. The discussed aspects will hopefully shed a different and critical light on the relationship between Foucault’s work and medicine, something that eventually can also be deduced from Foucault’s later work itself.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Health Policy,Education,Health (social science),Philosophy
Reference38 articles.
1. Adorno, F. P. 2014. Power over life, politics of death. In The government of life: Foucault, biopolitics, and neoliberalism, 98–111. New York: Fordham Univ Press.
2. Armstrong, D. 1987. Bodies of knowledge: Foucault and the problem of human anatomy. Sociological Theory and Medical Sociology, 59–76. London: Tavistock.
3. Childress, J. F. 2001. The failure to give: reducing barriers to organ donation. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 11(1): 1–16.
4. Dreyfus, H. L., and P. Rabinow. 1982. Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics. University of Chicago Press.
5. Elizondo-Omana, R. E., S. Guzman‐Lopez, and De Los Angeles Garcia‐Rodriguez, M. 2005. Dissection as a teaching tool: past, present, and future. The Anatomical Record Part B: The New Anatomist: An Official Publication of the American Association of Anatomists 285(1): 11–15.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献