Abstract
AbstractPhenomenology gives rise to certain ontological considerations that have far-reaching implications for standard conceptions of patient autonomy in medical ethics, and, as a result, the obligations of and to patients in clinical decision-making contexts. One such consideration is the phenomenological reduction in classical phenomenology, a core feature of which is the characterisation of our primary experiences as immediately and inherently meaningful. This paper builds on and extends the analyses of the phenomenological reduction in the works of Husserl, Heidegger, and Merleau-Ponty in order to identify and explain its implications for our current understanding of the principle of respect for patient autonomy and the norms of clinical decision making.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Health Policy,Education,Health (social science)
Reference53 articles.
1. Anderson, J. 2014. Autonomy and vulnerability entwined. In Vulnerability: New essays in ethics and feminist philosophy (pp, eds. C. 134 – 61), W. Mackenzie, Rogers, and S. Dodds, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2. Archard, D. 2008. Informed consent: Autonomy and self-ownership. Journal of Applied Philosophy 25 (1): 19–34.
3. Beauchamp, T. L., and J. F. Childress. 2013. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. 7th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4. Benson, P. 1991. Autonomy and oppressive socialization. Social Theory and Practice 17: 385–408.
5. Braver, L. 2014. Heidegger. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献