Abstract
AbstractIn the context of disadvantaged schools, remedial interventions are implemented to compensate for unfavourable conditions. However, there seems to be no clear rationale linking the characteristics which education systems use to decide whether a school is disadvantaged and the prospective remedial interventions. In addition, the specific needs and challenges faced by novice teachers working in disadvantaged schools are not well understood. Yet, this is important for the success of pedagogical measures improving outcomes for both teachers and students. This article aims to fill this gap by examining the terminology and indicators used across European educational systems to identify disadvantaged schools, as well as the perceptions of novice teachers at these schools about the issues they face. The empirical part of the article draws on evaluation data from a European project (NEST—Novice Educator Support and Training) which implemented an adaptive mentoring programme in Austria and six other European education systems. In a first step, the authors approach the definition of the concept of disadvantage and examine how disadvantaged schools are designated in the seven education systems. To this end, document analyses and expert interviews were examined. Analysing novice teacher data from the questionnaires developed for project evaluation, the authors observe how the challenges of disadvantaged schools are perceived from both the perspective of novice teachers as well as educational administrations. The findings provide valuable insights for the design and implementation of remedial interventions that are tailored to the unique challenges disadvantaged schools face.
Funder
Erasmus+
Universität Duisburg-Essen
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference26 articles.
1. Administration générale de l’Enseignement (AGE), Direction générale du Pilotage du Système éducatif (DGPSE), & Direction de l’exploitation des données (DED) (2021). Indice socioéconomique Explication de la procédure de calcul [Socio-economic index: Explanation of the calculation procedure], ISE des structures 2019–2020
2. Allen, R., Burgess, S., & Mayo, J. (2018). The teacher labour market, teacher turnover and disadvantaged schools: new evidence for England. Education Economics, 26(1), 4–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/09645292.2017.1366425.
3. Anderson-Park, E., van Veldhuizen, M., & Abs, H. J. (2022). Lehrkräfte an Schulen in herausfordernder Lage durch Mentoring unterstützen. SEMINAR, 28(4), 122–135.
4. Bettini, E., & Park, Y. (2021). Novice teachers’ experiences in high-poverty schools: an integrative literature review. Urban Education, 56(1), 3–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085916685763.
5. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.