Abstract
AbstractThis article presents a cognitively informed cross-cultural study of how rage is silenced in two narratives: Lee Chang-dong’s 2018 film Burning and William Faulkner’s 1939 short story “Barn Burning” that Lee’s film is inspired by. While earlier readings of Burning have privileged the individual aspects of the violent rage that is central to the film, a cognitive reading expands the scope by revealing how emotions are always embedded within social systems beyond the individual. This article draws on neurocognitive research as well as feminist investigations of affect to argue that such an expansion is needed to imagine non-violent expressions of rage. Tracing the violent and patriarchal genealogy of silenced rage from Lee to Faulkner, this article offers a comparative reading of intertextuality that focuses on how emotions are expressed in the father-son relationships in the two stories. Specifically, it considers how legal systems and the patriarchal family shape how characters express emotion. By exploring the possibilities for non-violent expressions of rage, the article ultimately considers the political ramifications of considering rage as primarily individual and suggests that we can discern relationships between social systems and expressions of emotion by attending to how complex and culturally situated emotions—like rage—travel across global translations and adaptations.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
Reference30 articles.
1. Ahmed, S. (2014). The cultural politics of emotion (2nd ed.). Edinburgh University Press.
2. Berlant, L. (2015). Structures of unfeeling: “Mysterious Skin.” International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, 28(3), 191–213.
3. Boman, B. (2021). The multifold intertextuality in Lee Chang Dong’s Burning. Social Sciences and Humanities Open, 3, 1–6.
4. Brennan, T. (2004). The transmission of affect. Cornell University Press.
5. Butler, J. (2020). The force of nonviolence: An ethico-political bind. Verso.