Comparison of laparoscopic and open inguinal–hernia repair in elderly patients: the experience of two comprehensive medical centers over 10 years

Abstract

Abstract Purpose The safety of laparoscopic inguinal–hernia repair must be carefully evaluated in elderly patients. Very little is known regarding the safety of the laparoscopic approach in elderly patients under surgical and medical co-management (SMC). Therefore, this study evaluated the safety of the laparoscopic approach in elderly patients, especially patients with multiple comorbidities under SMC. Methods From January 2012 to December 2021, patients aged ≥ 65 years who underwent open or laparoscopic inguinal–hernia repair during hospitalization were consecutively enrolled. Postoperative outcomes included major and minor operation-related complications, and other adverse events. To reduce potential selection bias, propensity score matching was performed between open and laparoscopic groups based on patients’ demographics and comorbidities. Results A total of 447 elderly patients who underwent inguinal–hernia repair were enrolled, with 408 (91.3%) underwent open and 39 (8.7%) laparoscopic surgery. All postoperative outcomes were comparable between open and laparoscopic groups after 1:1 propensity score matching (all p > 0.05). Moreover, compared to the traditional care group (n = 360), a higher proportion of the SMC group (n = 87) was treated via the laparoscopic approach (18.4% vs. 6.4%, p = 0.00). In the laparoscopic approach subgroup (n = 39), patients in the SMC group (n = 16) were older with multiple comorbidities but were at higher risks of only minor operation-related complications, compared to those in the traditional care group. Conclusions Laparoscopic inguinal–hernia repair surgery is safe for elderly patients, especially those with multiple comorbidities under SMC.