Author:
Aggett Peter J.,Hathcock John,Jukes David,Richardson David P.,Calder Philip C.,Bischoff-Ferrari Heike,Nicklas Theresa,Mühlebach Stefan,Kwon Oran,Lewis Janine,Lugard Maurits J. F.,Prock Peter
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Codex documents may be used as educational and consensus materials for member governments. Also, the WTO SPS Agreement recognizes Codex as the presumptive international authority on food issues. Nutrient bioavailability is a critical factor in determining the ability of nutrients to provide beneficial effects. Bioavailability also influences the quantitative dietary requirements that are the basis of nutrient intake recommendations and NRVs.
Health claims
Codex, EFSA and some national regulatory authorities have established guidelines or regulations that will permit several types of health claims. The scientific basis for claims has been established by the US FDA and EFSA, but not yet by Codex. Evidence-based nutrition differs from evidence-based medicine, but the differences are only recently gaining recognition. Health claims on foods may provide useful information to consumers, but many will interpret the information to mean that they can rely upon the food or nutrient to eliminate a disease risk.
Nutrient reference values
NRVs are designed to provide a quantitative basis for comparing the nutritive values of foods, helping to illustrate how specific foods fit into the overall diet. The INL-98 and the mean of adult male and female values provide NRVs that are sufficient when used as targets for individual intakes by most adults.
World Trade Organization agreements
WTO recognizes Codex as the primary international authority on food issues. Current regulatory schemes based on recommended dietary allowances are trade restrictive. A substantial number of decisions by the EFSA could lead to violation of WTO agreements.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Nutrition and Dietetics,Medicine (miscellaneous)
Reference22 articles.
1. Somogyi A, Hathcock J, Biesalski HK et al (2011) Scientific issues related to Codex Alimentarius goals: a review of principles, with examples. Reg Toxicol Pharmacol 60:161–164
2. Diplock AT, Aggett PJ, Ashwell M (1998) Scientific concepts of functional foods in Europe. Consensus document. Br J Nutr 81(Suppl 1):S1–S27
3. Aggett PJ, Antoine JM, Asp NG et al (2005) PASSCLAIM: consensus on criteria. Eur J Nutr 44(Suppl 1):i5–i30
4. Concato J, Shah N, Horwitz RI (2010) Randomized, controlled trials, observational studies, and the hierarchy of research designs. N Engl J Med 342:1887–1892
5. Sackett D, Rosenberg WMC, Muir Gray JA et al (1996) Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t. BMJ. doi:10.1136/bmj.312.7023.71
Cited by
29 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献