Why public organizations contribute to crosscutting policy programs: the role of structure, culture, and ministerial control

Author:

Molenveld Astrid,Verhoest Koen,Wynen Jan

Abstract

AbstractThe extent to which public organizations contribute to crosscutting policy programs is a question of organizational commitment, resource allocation, and monitoring. In this paper, we triangulate survey and interview data to study the explanatory power of organizational factors to understand the extent of organizational adaptation to crosscutting policy programs. In line with the hypotheses, the organizational task, culture, and the portfolio minister’s level of control seem to explain the extent of adaptation. Policy development as a task has a positive effect on organizational adaptation. However, this effect disappears if we add cultural variables. The second model indicates that a customer-oriented culture has a negative effect on organizational adaptation, and an innovation-oriented culture has a positive one. The portfolio minister’s level of control has a strong positive effect on organizational adaptation. Apparently, incentives are needed to hold organizations accountable and provide them clear direction regarding their contribution to crosscutting objectives.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Public Administration,General Social Sciences,Sociology and Political Science,Development

Reference85 articles.

1. 6, Perri, Leat, D., Seltzer, K., & Stoker, G. (1999). Governing in the round. Strategies for Holistic Government. London: Demos.

2. 6, Perri, Leat, D., Setzler, K., & Stoker, G. (2002). Towards Holistic Governance: The New Reform Agenda. Houndmills: Palgrave.

3. Agranoff, R. (2006). Inside collaborative networks: Ten lessons for public managers. Public Administration Review, 66(Special Issue), 56–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00666.x.

4. Alexander, E. R. (1995). How organizations act together, interorganizational coordination in theory and practice. Luxembourg: Gordon and Breach Publishers.

5. Bertelli, A. M. (2016). Who are the policy workers, and what are they doing? Citizen’s heuristics and democratic accountability in complex governance. Public Performance & Management Review, 40(2), 208–234.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3