Abstract
AbstractAccurate and conservative evaluations of the gradient wind in the free atmosphere are needed to account for high-wind hazards when designing wind resistance for critical infrastructure. This paper compared the validity of three existing gradient wind models to select an appropriate evaluation model, which enables us to accurately compute the asymmetric gradient wind field of a translating tropical cyclone under the condition of a symmetric pressure distribution and a constant translation velocity. The validity of the three models was assessed by evaluating the residuals in momentum conservation equations for the gradient wind under a specific tropical cyclone condition. The magnitude of the residuals was considered to be the measure of error in the gradient wind derived from each model. The results showed that the most frequently used model yielded the largest magnitude of residuals with the lowest maximum wind speed among the three models. The wind characteristics of the three models were validated using archived observation data of hurricanes. The physical reason for the difference in maximum wind speed among the three models was explained by the difference in the streamline feature of the gradient wind field. It was also revealed that the differences in maximum wind speed and magnitude of residuals became more pronounced as the translation speed and the intensity of a tropical cyclone increased. The comparative assessment of the three gradient wind models allowed us to identify the best model for use in conservative wind-resistant design and high-wind risk estimates.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Physics and Astronomy,General Engineering,General Environmental Science,General Materials Science,General Chemical Engineering
Reference28 articles.
1. Vickery PJ, Skerlj PF, Twisdale LA (2000) Simulation of hurricane risk in the U.S. using empirical track model. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 126:1222–1237
2. Vickery PJ, Wadhera D, Twisdale LA, Lavell FM (2009) U.S. hurricane wind speed risk and uncertainty. J Struct Eng 135:301–320
3. Vickery PJ, Masters FJ, Powell MD, Wadhera D (2009) Hurricane hazard modeling: The past, present, and future. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 97:392–405
4. Powell MD, Soukup G, Cocke S, Gulati S, Morisseau-Leroy N, Hamid S, Dorst N, Axe L (2005) State of Florida hurricane loss projection model: Atmospheric science component. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 93:651–674
5. Snaiki R, Wu T (2020) Revisiting hurricane track model for wind risk assessment. Struct Safety 87:102003
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献