Using efficiency frontier to inform operational decision-making

Author:

Benchener Matthew,Li LingfengORCID

Abstract

Abstract In this study, we introduce Efficiency Frontier, an economic assessment framework for business operations. The proposed framework emphasizes efficiency and sustainability. It aims to help organizations translate a complex metric system into a value index, conduct performance evaluation, and determine efficient resource planning strategies. Unlike the traditional methods that majorly focus on the achievement of performance targets, the proposed framework also accounts for the amount of resource that is invested in the achievement, which encourages managers to implement sustainable strategies that aim for long-term success. To validate the new framework, we systematically study the case of the City of Chicago’s 311 contact center with a base case analysis and a sensitivity analysis. In the base case, an Efficiency Frontier architected by a set of efficient solutions from 2013 to 2016 is used to identify outperforming scenarios given resource constraints. In the sensitivity analysis, we demonstrate the application of Efficiency Frontier in determining optimal resource planning strategies in conservative, moderate, and aggressive business investment scenarios. The base case Efficiency Frontier reveals that the marginal return on investment in improving the performance may diminish as investment increases. The sensitivity study suggests that optimal resource planning strategies should be adjusted according to value propositions. This work builds a framework for business leaders to economically assess their operational decision-making. Article highlights Efficient strategies can be identified by exploring the maximum value increase per unit of resource given cost scenarios The fund of a strategy should be reduced when the marginal return of the strategy begins to diminish. The framework’s ability to suggest cost-saving strategies is especially informative in resource-limited settings.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Physics and Astronomy,General Engineering,General Environmental Science,General Materials Science,General Chemical Engineering

Reference26 articles.

1. Neely A, Gregory M, Platts K (1995) Performance measurement system design. Int J Oper Prod 15:80–116

2. Kaplan R, Norton D (1993) Putting the balanced scorecard to work. Harv Bus Rev, pp 134–47

3. Kaplan R (2009) Conceptual foundations of the Balanced Scorecard. Handbooks of Management Accounting Research 3:1253–1269

4. Kaplan R, Norton D (1992) The Balanced Scorecard— - measures that drive performance. Harv Bus Rev, pp 71–79

5. Hendricks K, Wiedman C, Menor L (2004) The balanced scorecard: to adopt or not to adopt. Ivey Business J

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3