Abstract
Abstract
In this study, we introduce Efficiency Frontier, an economic assessment framework for business operations. The proposed framework emphasizes efficiency and sustainability. It aims to help organizations translate a complex metric system into a value index, conduct performance evaluation, and determine efficient resource planning strategies. Unlike the traditional methods that majorly focus on the achievement of performance targets, the proposed framework also accounts for the amount of resource that is invested in the achievement, which encourages managers to implement sustainable strategies that aim for long-term success. To validate the new framework, we systematically study the case of the City of Chicago’s 311 contact center with a base case analysis and a sensitivity analysis. In the base case, an Efficiency Frontier architected by a set of efficient solutions from 2013 to 2016 is used to identify outperforming scenarios given resource constraints. In the sensitivity analysis, we demonstrate the application of Efficiency Frontier in determining optimal resource planning strategies in conservative, moderate, and aggressive business investment scenarios. The base case Efficiency Frontier reveals that the marginal return on investment in improving the performance may diminish as investment increases. The sensitivity study suggests that optimal resource planning strategies should be adjusted according to value propositions. This work builds a framework for business leaders to economically assess their operational decision-making.
Article highlights
Efficient strategies can be identified by exploring the maximum value increase per unit of resource given cost scenarios
The fund of a strategy should be reduced when the marginal return of the strategy begins to diminish.
The framework’s ability to suggest cost-saving strategies is especially informative in resource-limited settings.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Physics and Astronomy,General Engineering,General Environmental Science,General Materials Science,General Chemical Engineering
Reference26 articles.
1. Neely A, Gregory M, Platts K (1995) Performance measurement system design. Int J Oper Prod 15:80–116
2. Kaplan R, Norton D (1993) Putting the balanced scorecard to work. Harv Bus Rev, pp 134–47
3. Kaplan R (2009) Conceptual foundations of the Balanced Scorecard. Handbooks of Management Accounting Research 3:1253–1269
4. Kaplan R, Norton D (1992) The Balanced Scorecard— - measures that drive performance. Harv Bus Rev, pp 71–79
5. Hendricks K, Wiedman C, Menor L (2004) The balanced scorecard: to adopt or not to adopt. Ivey Business J
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献