Author:
Lai Hsuan-Han,Yan Deng-Han,Chang Wei-Jheng,Chung Kun-Hsien,Xing Li-Xue,Chang Wei-Ting,Wu Weite
Abstract
AbstractThe non-destructive stress measurement method is the main trend in residual stress analysis. The ultrasonic method, which utilizes the acoustoelastic effect of the longitudinal critically refracted (LCR) wave, is one of the time-saving measurement techniques. During the practical stress measurement on a workpiece, various external factors may impact the transmission of acoustic waves and the resulting stress value. This study revealed and discussed the effects of four factors on the LCR wave: surface roughness of the examined material, temperature of the material, external mechanical vibration, and surface paint. The stress coefficient was determined by comparing the offset time of the acoustic wave with the stress measured by X-ray analyzer in the zero-stress specimens, which had undergone annealing and deep cryogenic treatment. The test results indicated that the surface roughness did not affect the transition time of the acoustic wave, but it did decrease the intensity of the signal. The increase in temperature and the transition time of the acoustic wave were in a linear relationship. Mechanical vibrations from the environment would not affect the transition time or signal intensity of the acoustic wave, whereas the application of surface paint increased the transition time. Although the effect of paint on the actual workpiece could not be easily modified during stress measurement, the ultrasonic method was still suitable for monitoring the stress of a specific position of the workpiece throughout its operational lifetime. The experiment data in this study were applied to measuring the residual stress of an aluminum ship component, and the result showed a good correspondence with X-ray stress analyzer results.
Funder
Ship and Ocean Industries R&D Center
National Science and Technology Council
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference51 articles.
1. Gou G, Zhang M, Chen H, Chen J, Li P, Yang YP. Effect of humidity on porosity, microstructure, and fatigue strength of A7N01S-T5 aluminum alloy welded joints in high-speed trains. Mater Design. 2015;85:309–17.
2. Totten GE, Howes M, Inoue T. Handbook of residual stress and deformation of steel. Materials Park: ASM International Publishers; 2002. p. 417–44.
3. Rossini NS, Dassisti M, Benyounis KY, Olabi AG. Methods of measuring residual stresses in components. Mater Design. 2012;35:572–88.
4. Shao Z, Zhang C, Li Y, Shen H, Zhang D, Yu X, Zhang Y. A review of non-destructive evaluation (NDE) techniques for residual stress profiling of metallic components in aircraft engines. Aerospace. 2022;9:534.
5. Delbergue D, Texier D, Levesque M, Bocher P. Comparison of two X-ray residual stress measurement methods: sin2ψ and cosα, through the determination of a martensitic steel X-ray elastic constant. Mater Res Proc. 2016;2:55–60.