Abstract
AbstractParticipation and social inclusion influence individuals’ health and well-being. These factors can be easily disturbed, especially for those with disabilities. Designers and engineers have tried harnessing technology to assist people via producing prototypes of assistive devices, such as smart clothing and furniture. This study approaches that user surface and inspects the user’s needs for participation through clothing and furniture. We thus arranged two similar workshops with student participants (n = 37) from four different educational units, creating 10 innovative concepts to support participation and social inclusion. All aimed to support participation via improved self-regulation, increased safety, or environmental control. Most of the concepts were connectible to another device, such as a mobile phone. All devices were made adjustable to meet personal preferences. This study aligns with previous ones by concluding that assistive technology should be unobtrusive, give timely responses, and interact with other devices. These initial concepts are ready to be turned into tangible prototypes.Article highlights
Participation and social inclusion have remarkable meaning for an individual’s well-being and health. Commonly, assistive technology aims to solve challenges in daily living by promoting health and well-being. For this reason, we arranged two similar co-creation workshops and asked the participants to innovate smart clothing and furniture concepts that will promote greater participation and more social inclusion.
This study also identified users’ needs, such as increased safety and independence, supported communication, self-regulation and awareness, and an effective learning tool.
The majority of the concepts were designed to be adjustable to meet personal preferences, let individuals interact with other devices (such as a mobile phone), and give timely responses.
Funder
Jenny ja Antti Wihurin Rahasto
Opetus- ja Kulttuuriministeriö
Tampere University including Tampere University Hospital, Tampere University of Applied Sciences
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Physics and Astronomy,General Engineering,General Environmental Science,General Materials Science,General Chemical Engineering
Reference40 articles.
1. Nussbaum M (1990) Non-relative virtues: an Aristotelian approach. In: Nussbaum M, Sen A (eds) The quality of life. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 242–269
2. Rochette A, Korner-Bitensky N, Levasseur M (2006) ‘Optimal’ participation: a reflective look. Disabil Rehabil 28(19):1231–1235. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280600554827
3. World Health Organization. Regional Office for Europe. (2019). Participation as a driver of health equity. World Health Organization. Regional Office for Europe https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/324909. License: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO
4. Perenboom RJ, Chorus AM (2003) Measuring participation according to the international classification of functioning, disability, and health (ICF). Disabil Rehabil 25(11–12):577–587. https://doi.org/10.1080/0963828031000137081
5. Hawton A, Green C, Dickens AP et al (2011) The impact of social isolation on the health status and health-related quality of life of older people. Qual Life Res 20(1):57–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-010-9717-2
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献