Abstract
Abstract
Automobile transport in megacities poses serious problems in the area of sustainability and environmental security. In the City of Buenos Aires (CABA) it represents 37% of GHG emissions and is an important source of pollutants dangerous to human health. As such, it is an energy consumption sector targeted for the implementation of methods that allow for sustainable urban transport. At the same time, very few previous studies about transport vehicle emissions have utilized the PM10 as an indicator of environmental contamination, considering that the negative impact of this environmental contaminant on human health is widely studied. An emission model linked to an atmospheric dispersion model, statistically validated, were used to study different scenarios of emissions generated by diesel buses. It was observed that in a scenario of zero bus emissions (E0), PM10 immission (air concentrations) concentration in CABA is reduced by half. When studying the energy transition from diesel buses to electric energy, while the rest of the vehicle fleet was maintained at the expense of fossil fuels, the local immission concentration of PM10 in CABA was of the same magnitude of that which was obtained when simulating the (E0) scenario of only private vehicle fleet. This study is relevant in the evaluation of public policy on vehicle emission mitigation that seeks to reduce health risks from poor air quality and to develop a more progressively sustainable city.
Article Highlights
Transition energy exclusively for buses could reduce PM10 immission values of CABA by 50%.
Thermal energy needed to the energy transition does not significant impact the PM10 immission values on the local air quality.
Electric buses could reduce the maximum PM10 immission value by half.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Physics and Astronomy,General Engineering,General Environmental Science,General Materials Science,General Chemical Engineering
Reference36 articles.
1. Paravantis JA, Tasios PD, Dourmas V, Andreakos G, Velaoras K, Kontoulis N, Mihalakakou P (2021) A regression analysis of the carbon footprint of megacities. Sustainability 13(3):1379
2. Dab W, Medina S, Quénel P, Le Moullec Y, Le Tertre A, Thelot B, Monteil C, Lameloise P, Pirard P, Momas I, Ferry R, Festy B (1996) Short term respiratory health effects of ambient air pollution: results of the APHEA project in Paris. J Epidemiol Community Health. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.50.Suppl_1.s42
3. Abrutzky R, Dawidowski L, Matus P, Lankao P (2012) Health effects of climate and air pollution in Buenos Aires: a first time series analysis. J Environ Prot. https://doi.org/10.4236/jep.2012.33033
4. Romieu I, Gouveia N, Cifuentes LA, de Leon AP, Junger W, Vera J, Strappa V, Hurtado- Díaz M, Miranda-Soberanis V, Rojas-Bracho L, Carbajal-Arroyo L, Tzintzun-Cervantes G ( 2012) HEIHealth Review Committee. Multicity study of air pollution and mortality in Latin America (the ESCALA study). Res Rep Health Eff Inst. PMID: 23311234
5. Nakhlé MM, Farah W, Ziadé N, Abboud M, Salameh D, Annesi-Maesano I (2015) Short- term relationships between emergency hospital admissions for respiratory and cardiovascular diseases and fine particulate air pollution in Beirut, Lebanon. Environ Monit Assess. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-015-4409-6