Abstract
AbstractTackling emissions from hydrocarbon production is a necessity because hydrocarbon production will last for a prolonged time. As a popular hydrocarbon production method, waterflooding operation is energy-intensive and accounts for significant CO2 emissions. This article investigates the effect of CO2 tax level on recovery process of already producing fields with waterflooding. Our methodology is waterflooding optimization in reservoir simulation models, specifically optimizing well-controls. Unlike traditional studies, our optimization objective comprises two components: the profitability of hydrocarbon production and an additional tax proportional to CO2 emissions. The associated CO2 emissions is estimated using a scheme developed upon an integrated model of reservoir, surface network, and topside facility. We examine our methodology on two cases with heterogeneous reservoir models. In each case, we optimize multi-scenarios enforcing different CO2 tax rates. The solutions indicate that imposing a higher CO2 tax rate reduces both emissions and hydrocarbon production. The fractional reduction of oil produced is however smaller than the emission reduction. While an increased tax rate drives the topside equipment to operate at higher efficiencies, the main effects of a higher tax rate are reduced water injection and more efficient subsurface drainage. There is a non-linear relationship between the reduced production and emissions. For increasing tax levels there are diminishing returns on lower emissions, reflecting reduced opportunities for emission reduction by changes in the drainage strategy. Some increments on the tax rate will therefore have negligible impacts on the optimal drainage strategy, and hence an adverse effect on the profitability with negligible emission reduction.
Funder
Norges Forskningsråd
NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Physics and Astronomy,General Engineering,General Environmental Science,General Materials Science,General Chemical Engineering
Reference82 articles.
1. IEA (2020) Key world energy statistics 2020. https://www.iea.org/reports/key-world-energy-statistics-2020. Accessed 28 Feb 2021
2. IEA (2020) Data and statistics: total energy supply (TES) by source, World 1990–2018. https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics/data-browser?country=WORLD&fuel=Energy%20supply&indicator=TPESbySource. Accessed 28 Feb 2021
3. IEA (2020) World energy outlook 2020. https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-outlook-2020. Accessed 28 Feb 2021
4. Gavenas E, Rosendahl KE, Skjerpen T (2015) CO2-emissions from Norwegian oil and gas extraction. Energy 90:1956–1966. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.07.025
5. Statistisk sentralbyrå (2021) Table 08940: Greenhouse gases, by source, energy product and pollutant 1990–2018. https://www.ssb.no/en/statbank/table/08940/. Accessed 28 Feb 2021
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献