The ethics of artificial intelligence systems in healthcare and medicine: from a local to a global perspective, and back

Author:

Vandemeulebroucke TijsORCID

Abstract

AbstractArtificial intelligence systems (ai-systems) (e.g. machine learning, generative artificial intelligence), in healthcare and medicine, have been received with hopes of better care quality, more efficiency, lower care costs, etc. Simultaneously, these systems have been met with reservations regarding their impacts on stakeholders’ privacy, on changing power dynamics, on systemic biases, etc. Fortunately, healthcare and medicine have been guided by a multitude of ethical principles, frameworks, or approaches, which also guide the use of ai-systems in healthcare and medicine, in one form or another. Nevertheless, in this article, I argue that most of these approaches are inspired by a local isolationist view on ai-systems, here exemplified by the principlist approach. Despite positive contributions to laying out the ethical landscape of ai-systems in healthcare and medicine, such ethics approaches are too focused on a specific local healthcare and medical setting, be it a particular care relationship, a particular care organisation, or a particular society or region. By doing so, they lose sight of the global impacts ai-systems have, especially environmental impacts and related social impacts, such as increased health risks. To meet this gap, this article presents a global approach to the ethics of ai-systems in healthcare and medicine which consists of five levels of ethical impacts and analysis: individual-relational, organisational, societal, global, and historical. As such, this global approach incorporates the local isolationist view by integrating it in a wider landscape of ethical consideration so to ensure ai-systems meet the needs of everyone everywhere.

Funder

Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung

Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference69 articles.

1. Abadia Elias M, Arruda Faversani L, Aparecida Vieira Moreira J, Viapiana Masiero A, Veronez da Cunha N (2023) Artificial intelligence in health and bioethical implications: a systematic review. Rev Bioét 31(4):e3542PT. https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-803420233542pt

2. Bear Don’t Walk IV O, Reyes Nieva H, Lee SS-J, Elhadad N (2022) A scoping review of ethics considerations in clinical natural language processing. JAMIA Open 5(2):ooac039. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamiaopen/ooac039

3. Belton P (2021) The computer chip industry has a dirty climate secret. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2021/sep/18/semiconductor-silicon-chips-carbon-footprint-climate (Accessed 22nd of April 2024)

4. Beauchamp TL, Childress, JF (2001) Principles of biomedical ethics (5th edn). Oxford University Press, Oxford & New York

5. Bolger M, Marin D, Tofighi-Niaki A, Seelmann L (2021) ‘Green mining’ is a myth . The case for cutting EU resource consumption. European Environmental Bureau & Friends of the Earth Europe, Brussels. https://eeb.org/library/green-mining-is-a-myth/ (Accessed on 16th of April 2024)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3