Surgical treatment of clinically infected mandibular fractures

Abstract

Abstract Purpose To clarify reasons for infections, surgical techniques, and occurrence of postoperative surgical site complications in infected mandibular fractures. Methods Patients with clinically infected mandibular fracture of the dentate part without preceding surgery were studied retrospectively. Clinical infection was defined to occur if pus, abscess, or a fistula in the fracture area was present. Patient-, fracture-, and surgery-related variables were evaluated, and predictors for postoperative complications were analysed. Results Of 908 patients with surgically treated fracture in the dentate part of the mandible, 41 had infected fracture at the time of surgery (4.5%). Of these patients, 46.3% were alcohol or drug abusers. Median delay from injury to surgery was 9 days. Patient-related factors were the most common cause for delayed surgery (n = 30, 73.2%), followed by missed diagnosis by a health care professional (n = 8, 19.5%). Twenty-two fractures were treated via extraoral approach (53.7%) and the remaining 19 intraorally (46.3%). Postoperative surgical site complications were found in 13 patients (31.7%), with recurrent surgical site infections predominating. Notable differences between total complication rates between intraoral and extraoral approaches were not detected. Secondary osteosynthesis for non-union was conducted for one patient treated intraorally. Conclusions Postoperative surgical site complications are common after treatment of infected mandibular fractures, and these occur despite the chosen surgical approach. Infected mandibular fractures heal mainly without bone grafting, and non-union is a rare complication. Due to the high complication rate, careful perioperative and postoperative care is required for these patients.