Author:
Pinto Rute,da Conceição Cunha Maria,Roseta-Palma Catarina,Marques João Carlos
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis,Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Pollution,Water Science and Technology,Environmental Engineering
Reference36 articles.
1. Borja Á, Galparsoro I, Solaun O, Muxika I, Tello EM, Uriarte A, Valencia V (2006) The European Water Framework Directive and the DPSIR, a methodological approach to assess the risk of failing to achieve good ecological status. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 66:84–96. doi: 10.1016/j.ecss.2005.07.021
2. Brouwer R (2008) The potential role of stated preference methods in the Water Framework Directive to assess disproportionate costs. J Environ Planning Manage 51:597–614
3. Brouwer R, Oosterhuis FH, Ansink JH, Barton DN, Lienhoop N (2009) POLICYMIX WP 4: Guidelines for estimating costs and benefits of policy instruments for biodiversity conservation. POLICYMIX Technical Brief 50pp
4. Bruins RJF, Heberling MT (2005) Economics and Ecological Risk Assessment. Applications to Watershed Management. CRC Press, 446pp
5. de Jonge VN, Pinto R, Turner K (2012) Integrating ecological, economic and social aspects to generate useful management information under the EU Directives’ ‘Ecosystem Approach’. Ocean Coast Manage 68:169–188
Cited by
16 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献