Author:
Iverson Guy,Humphrey Charles P.,O’Driscoll Michael,Sanderford Christa,Bean Eban,Underwood William Jarrod,Pradhan Sushama,Etheridge James Randall
Abstract
AbstractSeptic systems are potentially significant sources of nitrogen to groundwater and surface water. In-stream practices, such as in-stream bioreactors (IBRs), that promote or enhance nitrogen treatment are promising solutions to reduce nitrogen loads to nutrient-sensitive water. More work is needed to evaluate the efficiency of IBRs in new applications, such as residential sub-watersheds with a high-density of septic systems. The goal of this study was to quantify nitrogen treatment by an in-stream bioreactor (IBR) during baseflow conditions. The IBR was constructed in March 2017 when approximately 1 m of streambed sediment was excavated and backfilled with 0.75 m of woodchips capped by 0.2 m of rotary-kiln, expanded slate and boulder-sized riprap. Samples were collected monthly from July 2017 – March 2019 including IBR inflow, monitoring ports within the IBR, groundwater seeps draining to the IBR, and IBR outflow. Water samples were analyzed for total dissolved nitrogen (TDN), nitrate, ammonium, dissolved organic carbon, chloride, and nitrate isotopic fractionation. The IBR reduced the median concentration of TDN and nitrate by 40% and 77%, respectively. The median mass removal of TDN and nitrate was 26 and 5.2 g day− 1, respectively. Nitrogen-chloride ratios and isotopic fractionation data suggest that denitrification was likely a predominant nitrogen reduction mechanism. In addition to nitrogen treatment, the IBR provided other benefits by improving erosion control, streambank stabilization, and increased bank-full storage from 6 m3 to 19.2 m3. Results indicated that the IBR improved water quality and other residential sub-watersheds with septic systems would benefit from similar practices.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference64 articles.
1. Addy K, Gold AJ, Christianson LE, David MB, Schipper LA, Ratigan NA (2016) Denitrifying bioreactors for Nitrate removal: a Meta-analysis. J Environ Qual 45:873–881. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2015.07.0399
2. Bryant R, Baldwin A, Cahall B, Christianson L, Jaynes D, Penn C, Schwartz S (2019) Best Management Practices for Agricultural Ditch Management in the Phase 6 Chesapeake Bay Watershed Model. Report No. CBP/TRS-326-19, Chesapeake Bay Program https://d18lev1ok5leia.cloudfront.net/chesapeakebay/documents/ag_ditches_bmp_panel_report_draft_for_cbp_review_04sep2019.pdf Accessed on 28 April 2023
3. Burbery L, Abraham P (2022) Results from an In-Stream Woodchip Denitrifying Bioreactor Field Trial in South Canterbury. Annual Farmed Landscapes Research Centre Workshop 11 February 2022, Online Zoom Webinar, conference paper http://flrc.massey.ac.nz/publications.html Accessed 3 April 2024
4. Buszka TT, Reeves DM (2021) Pathways and timescales associated with nitrogen transport from septic systems in coastal aquifers intersected by canals. Hydrogeol J 29:1953–1964. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-021-02362-8
5. Christianson LE, Collick AS, Bryant RB, Rosen T, Bock EM, Allen AL, Kleinman PJA, May EB, Buda AR, Robinson J, Folmar GJ, Easton ZM (2017) Enhanced denitrification bioreactors hold Promise for Mid-atlantic Ditch Drainage. Ag Environ Lett 2:1–5. https://doi.org/10.2134/ael2017.09.0032