Ensuring Ecosystem Service Provision of Urban Water Nature-Based Solutions in Infill Areas: Comparing Green Factor for Districts and SWMM Modeling in Scenario Assessment

Author:

Lähde ElisaORCID,Dahlberg Niklas,Piirainen Paula,Rehunen AnttiORCID

Abstract

Abstract This study aims to explore the measurement of potential synergies between water management objectives and other ecosystem services generated by Nature-Based Solutions (NBS) in the context of urban planning. The research also investigates the comparative benefits of two analytical methods, Storm Water Management Model (SWMM) and green area factor for districts (GAFD). The study employs Malmi district in Helsinki, Finland, as a case study, examining five distinct NBS scenarios with varying degrees of integration. The results affirm that NBS can indeed enhance ecosystem services provision and stormwater management. The comparative analysis of the two methods, reveals that scenarios with high green factors exhibit effective flood risk reduction, while those with low green factors struggle to manage water, emphasizing the importance of balancing green and built elements in urban planning for optimal flood risk reduction. Furthermore, the study underscores the advantages of the two methods: GAFD offers simplicity and lower expertise requirements, generating valuable insights into ecosystem services, while SWMM provides precise stormwater management data. The findings emphasize the significance of diverse NBS combinations that harness the multifunctional aspects of green infrastructure, highlighting the need for integrated urban planning. The utilization of GAFD analysis provides a comprehensive districtwide perspective in a flexible manner, thereby improving the comprehension of the interconnected nature of urban green spaces. Highlights Nature-based solutions (NBS) support urban stormwater management in infill areas. Green Area Factor for Districts (GAFD) is a practical tool to compare NBS options. GAFD and SWMM modeling results on stormwaters are comparable for common rain events. NBS size, quality and diversity reduce peak flows and enhance ecosystem services. Assessment of scenarios with the GAFD tool helps to identify multiple benefits of NBS.

Funder

Joint Programming Initiative Water challenges for a changing world

Aalto University

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis,Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Pollution,Water Science and Technology,Environmental Engineering

Reference61 articles.

1. Alves A, Gersonius B, Kapelan Z, Vojinovic Z, Sanchez A (2019) Assessing the Co-Benefits of green-blue-grey infrastructure for sustainable urban flood risk management. J Environ Manage 239:244–254

2. Andersson E, Borgström S, Haase D et al (2021) Urban resilience thinking in practice: ensuring flows of benefit from green and blue infrastructure. Ecol Soc 26(4):39. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-12691-260439

3. City of Helsinki (2013–2021) Helsinki riverbeds, streams and ditches. Background materials: city of Helsinki (2013–2021); HSY (2021), National Land Survey of Finland (2022). https://kartta.hel.fi/?setlanguage=en#. Retrieved in June 2021

4. City of Helsinki (2014) Register of public areas in the City of Helsinki. Updated 2018. https://kartta.hel.fi/?setlanguage=en#. Retrieved in June 2021

5. City of Helsinki (2021a) Malmi design principles. https://www.hel.fi/static/liitteet/kaupunkiymparisto/uutiset/Malmin_keskustan_suunnitteluperiaatteet_seloste_01062021.pdf. Accessed in November 2022

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3