Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
The COVID-19 pandemic has affected the way many individuals go about their daily lives. This study attempted to model the complexity of change in lifestyle quality as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic and its context within the UK adult population.
Methods
Data from the COVID-19 Psychological Research Consortium Study (Wave 3, July 2020; N = 1166) were utilised. A measure of COVID-19-related lifestyle change captured how individuals’ lifestyle quality had been altered as a consequence of the pandemic. Exploratory factor analysis and latent profile analysis were used to identify distinct lifestyle quality change subgroups, while multinomial logistic regression analysis was employed to describe class membership.
Results
Five lifestyle dimensions, reflecting partner relationships, health, family and friend relations, personal and social activities, and work life, were identified by the EFA, and seven classes characterised by distinct patterns of change across these dimensions emerged from the LPA: (1) better overall (3.3%), (2) worse except partner relations (6.0%), (3) worse overall (2.5%), (4) better relationships (9.5%), (5) better except partner relations (4.3%), (6) no different (67.9%), and (7) worse partner relations only (6.5%). Predictor variables differentiated membership of classes. Notably, classes 3 and 7 were associated with poorer mental health (COVID-19 related PTSD and suicidal ideation).
Conclusions
Four months into the pandemic, most individuals’ lifestyle quality remained largely unaffected by the crisis. Concerningly however, a substantial minority (15%) experienced worsened lifestyles compared to before the pandemic. In particular, a pronounced deterioration in partner relations seemed to constitute the more severe pandemic-related lifestyle change.
Funder
Economic and Social Research Council
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Psychiatry and Mental health,Social Psychology,Health (social science),Epidemiology
Reference65 articles.
1. Balanzá–Martínez V, Atienza-Carbonell B, Kapczinski F, De Boni RB (2020) Lifestyle behaviours during the COVID-19–time to connect. Acta Psychiatr Scand 141:399–400. https://doi.org/10.1111/acps.13177
2. Ferguson N, Laydon D, Nedjati-Gilani G et al (2020) Report 9: impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) to reduce COVID19 mortality and healthcare demand. Imperial College London, London. https://doi.org/10.25561/77482
3. Holmes EA, O’Connor RC, Perry VH et al (2020) Multidisciplinary research priorities for the COVID-19 pandemic: a call for action for mental health science. Lancet Psychiatry 7:547–560. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30168-1
4. Moreno C, Wykes T, Galderisi S et al (2020) How mental health care should change as a consequence of the COVID-19 pandemic. Lancet Psychiatry 7:813–824. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30307-2
5. World Health Organization (2020) Mental health and psychosocial considerations during the COVID-19 outbreak. World Health Organization. Available at https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/mental-health-considerations.pdf. Accessed 14 Mar 2021