Effects of medical service fee revision on reducing irrational psychotropic polypharmacy in Japan: an interrupted time-series analysis

Author:

Okada Yusuke,Akazawa ManabuORCID

Abstract

Abstract Purpose According to the revised Japanese medical service fees aimed at reducing irrational psychotropic polypharmacy, medical service fees are reduced if the number of simultaneously prescribed psychotropic drugs exceeds the standard. This study primarily aims to examine the effect of the 2018 revision. Methods Using a large Japanese administrative claims database, we retrospectively identified five groups (April 2013–September 2018) prescribed at least one drug from the following drug groups: anxiolytics, hypnotics, sum of anxiolytics and hypnotics, antipsychotics, and antidepressants (study population in each group: 547,511, 406,524, 759,137, 112,929, and 201,046, respectively). We used an interrupted time-series design to evaluate changes in the proportion of patients prescribed more than the standard number of drugs. Results After the 2018 revision, the proportion of patients prescribed more than the standard number of drugs significantly decreased only for the sum of anxiolytics and hypnotics; estimated changes in level and trend were − 0.60% [− 0.69%, − 0.52%] and − 0.04% [− 0.06%, − 0.02%] per month, respectively. The proportion of patients exhibiting a decrease in the number of prescribed drugs from more than the standard to within the standard increased when the revision was enforced (April 2018); this proportion in April 2018 was 36.3%, while all other proportions were in the range of 12.1–22.3%. Conclusion The 2018 revision promoted a reduction in the number of prescribed drugs, which served as an important factor in the decrease in the proportion of patients prescribed more than the standard number of drugs for the sum of anxiolytics and hypnotics.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Social Psychology,Health (social science),Epidemiology

Reference32 articles.

1. National Association of State Mental Health Program Directors (NASMHPD) Medical Directors Council and State Medicaid Directors (2001) Technical report on psychiatric polypharmacy. https://www.nasmhpd.org/sites/default/files/Polypharmacy.pdf. Accessed 12 Jan 2021

2. Kukreja S, Kalra G, Shah N, Shrivastava A (2013) Polypharmacy in psychiatry: a review. Mens Sana Monogr 11:82–99. https://doi.org/10.4103/0973-1229.104497

3. Kingsbury SJ, Yi D, Simpson GM (2001) Rational and irrational polypharmacy. Psychiatr Serv 52:1033–1036. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.52.8.1033

4. Japanese Society of Mood Disorders (2019) Japanese Society of Mood Disorders guideline II: major depressive disorder 2016 (in Japanese) https://www.secretariat.ne.jp/jsmd/iinkai/katsudou/data/20190724-02.pdf. Accessed 12 Jan 2021

5. Japanese Society of Neuropsychopharmacology (2017) Guideline for pharmacological therapy of schizophrenia (in Japanese) https://www.jsnp-org.jp/img/csrinfo/togoshiccho_00.pdf. Accessed 12 Jan 2021

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3