Validity, reliability, acceptability, and utility of the Social Inclusion Questionnaire User Experience (SInQUE): a clinical tool to facilitate social inclusion amongst people with severe mental health problems

Author:

Mezey Gillian,White Sarah,Harrison Isobel,Bousfield Jennifer,Lloyd-Evans Brynmor,Payne Sarah,Killaspy Helen

Abstract

Abstract Background Individuals with severe mental health problems are at risk of social exclusion, which may complicate their recovery. Mental health and social care staff have, until now, had no valid or reliable way of assessing their clients’ social inclusion. The Social Inclusion Questionnaire User Experience (SInQUE) was developed to address this. It assesses five domains: social integration; productivity; consumption; access to services; and political engagement, in the year prior to first psychiatric admission (T1) and the year prior to interview (T2) from which a total score at each time point can be calculated. Aims To establish the validity, reliability, and acceptability of the SInQUE in individuals with a broad range of psychiatric diagnoses receiving care from community mental health services and its utility for mental health staff. Method Participants were 192 mental health service users with psychosis, personality disorder, or common mental disorder (e.g., depression, anxiety) who completed the SInQUE alongside other validated outcome measures. Test–retest reliability was assessed in a sub-sample of 30 participants and inter-rater reliability was assessed in 11 participants. SInQUE ratings of 28 participants were compared with those of a sibling with no experience of mental illness to account for shared socio-cultural factors. Acceptability and utility of the tool were assessed using completion rates and focus groups with staff. Results The SInQUE demonstrated acceptable convergent validity. The total score and the Social Integration domain score were strongly correlated with quality of life, both in the full sample and in the three diagnostic groups. Discriminant validity and test–retest reliability were established across all domains, although the test–retest reliability on scores for the Service Access and Political Engagement domains prior to first admission to hospital (T1) was lower than other domains. Inter-rater reliability was excellent for all domains at T1 and T2. Conclusions The component of the SInQUE that assesses current social inclusion has good psychometric properties and can be recommended for use by mental health staff.

Funder

School for Social Care Research

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Social Psychology,Health (social science),Epidemiology

Reference26 articles.

1. Burchardt T, Le Grand J, Piachaud D (2002) Degrees of exclusion: developing a dynamic, multi-dimensional measure. In: Hills J, Le Grand J, Piachaud D (eds) Understanding Social Exclusion. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, pp 30–43

2. Morgan C, Burns T, Fitzpatrick R, Pinfold V, Priebe S (2007) Social exclusion and mental health: Conceptual and methodological review. Br J Psychiatry. 191:477–483. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.106.034942

3. Silver H (2015) The contexts of social inclusion. https://www.un.org/esa/desa/papers/2015/wp144_2015.pdf. Accessed 11 Dec 2017.

4. Huxley P, Thornicroft G (2003) Social inclusion, social quality and mental illness. Br J Psychiatry. 182:289–290. https://doi.org/10.1192/BJP.182.4.289

5. Levitas R (2006) The concept and measurement of social exclusion. https://www.open.ac.uk/poverty/pdf/poverty-and-social-exclusion_chap5.pdf. Accessed 19 Jan 2018.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3