Measuring social exclusion and its distribution in England

Author:

Dykxhoorn JenniferORCID,Osborn DavidORCID,Fischer LauraORCID,Troy DavidORCID,Kirkbride James B.ORCID,Walters KateORCID

Abstract

Abstract Background Social exclusion is a multidimensional concept referring processes which restrict the ability of individuals or groups to participate fully in society. While social exclusion has been used to explore patterns of disadvantage, it has been difficult to measure. Thus, we aimed to use population-based data to measure social exclusion and its constituent domains and to describe its distribution in England. Methods We used data from Understanding Society in 2009/2010 develop a multidimensional measurement approach, replicated in 2018/2019. We defined five domains of social exclusion from the literature and expert consultation: material, relational, political, digital, and structural. In both waves, we identified measures for each domain, then conducted principal component analysis to identify the components. We generated domain scores and an overall social exclusion score. We described the distribution of social exclusion and its domains by sex, region, age, and ethnicity. Results We found the level of social exclusion was higher in the youngest age group and decreased by age. We found elevated levels of overall social exclusion for ethnic minoritised groups including African, Arab, and Caribbean groups compared to White British groups. We found distinct patterns within each domain. Discussion We developed an overall measure of social exclusion with five domains, and finding distinct patterns of social exclusion by age, ethnicity, and region which varied across domain. These findings suggest that attention should be paid to the separate domains due to different population distributions. This measurement approach moves beyond conceptual discussions of social exclusion and demonstrates the utility of a quantitative measure of social exclusion for use in health and social research.

Funder

School for Public Health Research

UCLH Biomedical Research Centre

NIHR Three Schools Mental Health Fellowship

NIHR Academy

NIHR Applied Research Collaborative North Thames

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Social Psychology,Health (social science),Epidemiology

Reference40 articles.

1. Silver H (1995) Reconceptualizing social disadvantage: three paradigms of social exclusion. In: Rodgers G, Gore C, Figueiredo J (eds) Social exclusion: rhetoric, reality, responses. International Labour Organisation, Geneva, pp 57–75

2. Gore C (1995) Markets, citizenship, and social exclusion. In: Rodgers G, Gore C, Figueiredo J (eds) Social exclusion: rhetoric, reality, responses. International Labour Organisation, Geneva, pp 1–10

3. Popay J (2010) Understanding and tackling social exclusion [editorial]. J Res Nurs 15(4):295–297. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987110370529

4. Stewart K (2002) Measuring well-being and exclusion in Europe’s regions. Retrieved September 24, 2021 from https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/6395/1/Measuring_Well-Being_and_Exclusion_in_Europe's_Regions.pdf

5. Levitas R, Levitas R (2005) Three Discourses of social exclusion. Inclusive society: social exclusion and New Labour, 2nd edition. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230511552

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3