Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
Clozapine is the most effective intervention for treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS). Several studies report ethnic disparities in clozapine treatment. However, few studies restrict analyses to TRS cohorts alone or address confounding by benign ethnic neutropenia. This study investigates ethnic equity in access to clozapine treatment for people with treatment-resistant schizophrenia spectrum disorder.
Methods
A retrospective cohort study, using information from 11 years of clinical records (2007–2017) from the South London and Maudsley NHS Trust. We identified a cohort of service-users with TRS using a validated algorithm. We investigated associations between ethnicity and clozapine treatment, adjusting for sociodemographic factors, psychiatric multi-morbidity, substance misuse, neutropenia, and service-use.
Results
Among 2239 cases of TRS, Black service-users were less likely to be receive clozapine compared with White British service-users after adjusting for confounders (Black African aOR = 0.49, 95% CI [0.33, 0.74], p = 0.001; Black Caribbean aOR = 0.64, 95% CI [0.43, 0.93], p = 0.019; Black British aOR = 0.61, 95% CI [0.41, 0.91], p = 0.016). It was additionally observed that neutropenia was not related to treatment with clozapine. Also, a detention under the Mental Health Act was negatively associated clozapine receipt, suggesting people with TRS who were detained are less likely to be treated with clozapine.
Conclusion
Black service-users with TRS were less likely to receive clozapine than White British service-users. Considering the protective effect of treatment with clozapine, these inequities may place Black service-users at higher risk for hospital admissions and mortality.
Funder
National Institute for Health Research
Medical Research Council
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Psychiatry and Mental health,Social Psychology,Health (social science),Epidemiology
Reference59 articles.
1. Meghani SH, Byun E, Gallagher RM (2012) Time to take stock: a meta-analysis and systematic review of analgesic treatment disparities for pain in the United States. Pain Med 13:150–174. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-4637.2011.01310.x
2. Pinder RJ, Ferguson J, Møller H (2016) Minority ethnicity patient satisfaction and experience: results of the National Cancer Patient Experience Survey in England. BMJ Open 6:e011938. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011938
3. Henderson J, Gao H, Redshaw M (2013) Experiencing maternity care: the care received and perceptions of women from different ethnic groups. BMC Pregnancy Childb 13:196. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-13-196
4. McManus S, Bebbington P, Jenkins R, Brugha T (2016) Mental health and wellbeing in England: adult psychiatric morbidity survey 2014. In: NHS Digit. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/556596/apms-2014-full-rpt.pdf
5. Chui Z, Gazard B, MacCrimmon S et al (2020) Inequalities in referral pathways for young people accessing secondary mental health services in south east London. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-020-01603-7
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献