Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
Both aggression toward others and self peak in adolescence and interpersonal violence and suicide are among the leading causes of death in young people worldwide. Individuals who show both aggression toward others and self, i.e. dual-harm, may experience the worst outcomes. The current study investigates clinical and parenting factors associated with dual-harming in adolescence, to provide new insights for prevention and treatment.
Methods
In a prospective cohort of adolescents, oversampled on emotional and behavioral problems (n = 1022; aged 12–17 years), we investigated co-occurrence in harm toward others and self and presented findings in an area-proportional Euler diagram. Four harm groups (no harm, other-harm, self-harm, and dual-harm) were compared on intelligence scores, general functioning, emotional and behavioral problems, substance use, parental hostility, and harsh parenting with ANCOVAs and logistic regressions.
Results
In adolescents that other-harmed, the risk of self-harm was 1.9 times higher than for those who did not harm others. Dual-harm adolescents reported worse overall functioning, more emotional and behavioral problems, more parental hostility and harshness, and were more likely to use substances than those who did not engage in aggressive behaviors. No evidence of differences in intelligence scores between groups were found.
Conclusion
These findings highlight a vulnerable group of adolescents, at risk of future suicide, violent offending, and the development of severe psychopathology. Dual-harm is a promising marker for early intervention and referral to specialized mental health professionals. Further research is needed to examine underlying pathways and risk factors associated with persistent dual-harm trajectories into adulthood.
Funder
Erasmus Medisch Centrum
Parnassia Psychiatric Institute Antes
GGz Breburg
GGz Delfland
GGz Westelijk Noord-Brabant
Yulius
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Psychiatry and Mental health,Social Psychology,Health (social science),Epidemiology
Reference49 articles.
1. Kinchin I, Doran CM, Hall WD, Meurk C (2017) Understanding the true economic impact of self-harming behaviour. Lancet Psychiatry 4(12):900–901. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(17)30411-X
2. Rivenbark JG, Odgers CL, Caspi A, Harrington H, Hogan S, Houts RM, Poulton R, Moffitt TE (2018) The high societal costs of childhood conduct problems: evidence from administrative records up to age 38 in a longitudinal birth cohort. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 59(6):703–710. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12850
3. Drapeau CW, McIntosh JL (2018) U.S.A. suicide 2017: Official final data. American Association of Suicidology, Washington, DC. https://suicidology.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/2017datapgsv1-FINAL.pdf. Accessed 28 Mar 2022
4. Moffitt TE (1993) Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior: a developmental taxonomy. Psychol Rev 100(4):674. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.100.4.674
5. Farrington DP (1986) Age and crime. Crime Justice 7:189–250. https://doi.org/10.1086/449114
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献