Impact on mental health care and on mental health service users of the COVID-19 pandemic: a mixed methods survey of UK mental health care staff

Author:

Johnson Sonia,Dalton-Locke ChristianORCID,Vera San Juan Norha,Foye Una,Oram Sian,Papamichail Alexandra,Landau Sabine,Rowan Olive Rachel,Jeynes Tamar,Shah Prisha,Sheridan Rains Luke,Lloyd-Evans Brynmor,Carr Sarah,Killaspy Helen,Gillard Steve,Simpson Alan,Bell Andy,Bentivegna Francesca,Botham Joseph,Edbrooke-Childs Julian,Goldsmith Lucy,Grünwald Lisa,Harju-Seppänen Jasmine,Hatch Stephani,Henderson Claire,Howard Louise,Lane Rebecca,Ledden Sarah,Leverton Monica,Lomani Jo,Lyons Natasha,McCrone Paul,Ntephe Chukwuma U.,Ocloo Josephine Enyonam,Osborn David,Pilling Steve,Poursanidou Konstantina,Scott Hannah Rachel,Steare Thomas,Stuart Ruth,Tomlin André,Turner Kati,Tzouvara Vasiliki,

Abstract

Abstract Purpose The COVID-19 pandemic has potential to disrupt and burden the mental health care system, and to magnify inequalities experienced by mental health service users. Methods We investigated staff reports regarding the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in its early weeks on mental health care and mental health service users in the UK using a mixed methods online survey. Recruitment channels included professional associations and networks, charities, and social media. Quantitative findings were reported with descriptive statistics, and content analysis conducted for qualitative data. Results 2,180 staff from a range of sectors, professions, and specialties participated. Immediate infection control concerns were highly salient for inpatient staff, new ways of working for community staff. Multiple rapid adaptations and innovations in response to the crisis were described, especially remote working. This was cautiously welcomed but found successful in only some clinical situations. Staff had specific concerns about many groups of service users, including people whose conditions are exacerbated by pandemic anxieties and social disruptions; people experiencing loneliness, domestic abuse and family conflict; those unable to understand and follow social distancing requirements; and those who cannot engage with remote care. Conclusion This overview of staff concerns and experiences in the early COVID-19 pandemic suggests directions for further research and service development: we suggest that how to combine infection control and a therapeutic environment in hospital, and how to achieve effective and targeted tele-health implementation in the community, should be priorities. The limitations of our convenience sample must be noted.

Funder

National Institute for Health Research

University College London

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Social Psychology,Health (social science),Epidemiology

Reference24 articles.

1. Royal College of Psychiatrists, Press Release, 15.5.2020. Psychiatrists see alarming rise in patients needing urgent and emergency care and forecast a 'tsunami' of mental illness. https://www.rcpsych.ac.uk/news-and-features/latest-news/detail/2020/05/15/psychiatrists-see-alarming-rise-in-patients-needing-urgent-and-emergency-care. Accessed 31 May 2020

2. The Lancet Psychiatry. Mental health and COVID-19: change the conversation (2020). The Lancet Psychiatry 7(6): 463.

3. Mezzina R, Sashidharan S, Rosen A, Killaspy H, Saraceno B. Mental health in the age of coronavirus: time for change. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology. SPPE-D-20-00223. In Press.

4. Kozloff N, Mulsant BH, Stergiopoulos V, Voineskos AN (2020) The COVID-19 global pandemic: implications for people with schizophrenia and related disorders. Schizophr Bull. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbaa051

5. Killaspy H, Priebe S, Bremner S, Dowling S, Harrison I, Krotofil J, McPherson P, Sandhu S, Arbuthnott M, Curtis S, Leavey G, Shepherd G, Eldridge S, King M (2016) Quality of Life, autonomy, satisfaction, and costs associated with mental health supported accommodation services in England; a national survey. Lancet Psychiatry 3(12):1129–1137

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3