Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
Evidence-based policy making is increasingly being advocated by governments and scholars. To show that policies are informed by evidence, policy-related documents that cite external sources should ideally provide direct access to, and accurately represent, the referenced source and the evidence it provides. Our aim was to find a way to systematically assess the prevalence of referencing accuracy and accessibility issues in referenced statements selected from a sample of mental health-related policy documents.
Method
236 referenced statements were selected from 10 mental health-related policy documents published between 2013 and 2018. Policy documents were chosen as the focus of this investigation because of their relative accessibility and impact on clinical practice. Statements were rated against their referenced sources in terms of the (i) content accuracy in relation to the information provided by the referenced source and (ii) degree of accessibility of the source and the required evidence from the references provided.
Results
Of the 236 statements, 141 (59.7%) accurately represented the referenced source, 45 (19.1%) contained major errors and 50 (21.2%) contained minor errors in accuracy. For accessibility, 126 (53.4%) directly referenced primary sources of evidence that supported the claims made, 36 (15.3%) contained indirect references, 18 (7.6%) provided ‘dead-end’ references, and 11 (4.7%) references were completely inaccessible.
Conclusions
With only slightly over half of all statements assessed providing fully accessible references and accurately representing the referenced source, these components of referencing quality deserve further attention if evidence-informed policy goals are to be achieved. The rating framework used in the current study proved to be a simple and straightforward method to assess these components and can provide a baseline against which interventions can be designed to improve referencing quality.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Psychiatry and Mental health,Social Psychology,Health (social science),Epidemiology
Reference20 articles.
1. Young K, Ashby D, Boaz A, Grayson L (2002) Social science and the evidence-based policy movement. Soc Policy Soc 1:03
2. Rutter J, Gold J (2015) Show your workings: assessing how government uses evidence to make policy. Institute for government.
https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/sites/default/files/publications/4545%20IFG%20-%20Showing%20your%20workings%20v8b.pdf
. Accessed 26 Feb 2019
3. Lawson LA, Fosker R (1999) Accuracy of references in psychiatric literature: a survey of three journals. Psychiatr Bull 23(4):221–224
4. Gosling CM, Cameron M, Gibbons PF (2004) Referencing and quotation accuracy in four manual therapy journals. Manual Ther 9(1):36–40
5. Warren KJ, Bhatia N, Teh W, Fleming M, Lange M (1997) Reference and quotation accuracy in the major and minor infectious diseases journals. In 3rd International Congress on Peer Review in Biomedical Publication, pp. 18–20
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献