A qualitative integrative analysis of service users’ and service providers’ perspectives on ways to reduce coercion in mental health care-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

A qualitative integrative analysis of service users’ and service providers’ perspectives on ways to reduce coercion in mental health care

Published:2023-02-13 Issue:9 Volume:58 Page:1353-1363
ISSN:0933-7954
Container-title:Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
language:en
Short-container-title:Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol

Author:

Aluh Deborah Oyine^ORCID,Onu Justus Uchenna,Ayilara Olaniyi,Pedrosa Barbara,Silva Manuela,Grigaitė Ugnė,Dias Margarida,Cardoso Graça,Caldas-de-Almeida José Miguel

Funder

“la Caixa” Foundation

Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Social Psychology,Health (social science),Epidemiology

Link

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00127-023-02435-x.pdf

Reference62 articles.

1. Herrman H, Allan J, Galderisi S, Javed A, Rodrigues M (2022) Alternatives to coercion in mental health care: WPA position statement and call to action. World Psychiatry 21:159–160

2. Chieze M, Hurst S, Kaiser S, Sentissi O (2019) Effects of seclusion and restraint in adult psychiatry: a systematic review. Front Psychiatry 10:491

3. Disabilities C on the R of P with (2014) General Comment No. 1 on Article 12: Equal recognition before the law. CRPD/C/GC/1. UN,

4. Freeman MC, Kolappa K, de Almeida JMC, Kleinman A, Makhashvili N, Phakathi S, Saraceno B, Thornicroft G (2015) Reversing hard won victories in the name of human rights: a critique of the General Comment on Article 12 of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. The lancet Psychiatry 2:844–850

5. Martin W, Gurbai S (2019) Surveying the Geneva impasse: Coercive care and human rights. Int J Law Psychiatry 64:117–128