Individualism-Collectivism: A Brazilian-Portuguese Version of Triandis and Gelfand’s Scale
-
Published:2023-03-01
Issue:2
Volume:31
Page:251-268
-
ISSN:2358-1883
-
Container-title:Trends in Psychology
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Trends in Psychol.
Author:
Pérez-Nebra Amalia R.ORCID, Tordera NúriaORCID, Rodríguez IsabelORCID, Sandall HugoORCID, Peiró José MariaORCID, de São Paulo EduardoORCID
Abstract
AbstractHuman values play an essential role in life, highlighting what is socially desirable and influencing people’s actions. In order to deliver a way of measuring such construct, this work aimed to test the stability of the horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism scale (HVIC) structure in Brazil through some of its states. Two studies were conducted. Study 1 presented the validation of the measurement tool replicating the original Triandis and Gelfand (1998) study, comparing similar samples in Brazil and the USA (undergraduate students;N = 200 to each group). The structure found was similar in both countries, but the modification indexes suggest a change in one item load compared to the original study. Study 2 compared data from five Brazilian states, (blue-collar workers;N = 5,589). Results revealed that the four-factor structure was well adjusted and showed minor differences between and within states. Practical and theoretical contributions were provided in particular for horizontal and vertical dimensions, in particular, challenging the horizontalism found in previous studies and suggesting other groups of references in Brazil.
Funder
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior Universidad de Zaragoza
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Psychology
Reference70 articles.
1. Albright, J. J. (2008). Confirmatory factor analysis using Amos, LISREL, and MPlus. The Trustees of Indiana University, 77. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-200605000-00008 2. Bal, P. M., Dóci, E., Lub, X., Van Rossenberg, Y. G. T., Nijs, S., Achnak, S., … Van Zelst, M. (2019). Manifesto for the future of work and organisational psychology. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 28(3), 289–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2019.1602041 3. Batista, A. P., Queiroz, E. M., Furbino-Barbosa, K., Oliveira, A. M., Gusmão, L., & Machado-Coelho, G. L. L. (2014). Ancestralidade genética nas áreas distritais de Ouro Preto, Minas Gerais, Brasil. In R. M. B. Cicarelli (Ed.), Grupo de habla española y portuguesa de la ISFG. Ghep-isfg. https://ghep-isfg.org/es/meetings/araraquara-2018/posters/ 4. Bond, M. H., Leung, K., Au, A., Tong, K. K., & Chemonges-Nielson, Z. (2004). Combining social axioms with values in predicting social behaviours. European Journal of Personality, 18(3), 177–191. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.509 5. Bontempo, R., Lobel, S., & Triandis, H. C. (1990). Compliance and value internalisation in Brazil and the U.S.: effects of allocentrism and anonymity. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 21(2), 200–213.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|