Abstract
AbstractThe International Standards on Auditing (ISA) consider the understanding of the control environment as a basic phase of an auditor’s assessment of internal control. This comprehension influences the nature, timing, extent and, ultimately, the quality of the procedures managed by auditors. Several studies have investigated the determinants and implications of control environment assessment, internal control evaluation, and audit quality. However, very few studies have adopted a human capital perspective and matched the number and type of the control environment elements considered during control environment evaluation with auditors’ human capital attributes. Starting from these considerations, the paper examines the relationship between auditors’ human capital attributes and the assessment of the control environment. Based on a survey of 100 Italian external auditors, this study reveals that auditors perceive “Communication and enforcement of integrity and ethical values” as a relevant element in undertaking control environment assessments. Moreover, the findings indicate that the type of audit firm (Big Four), the regional context (Northern Italy), and the auditor’s degree specialization (accounting, finance and auditing) influence the control environment assessment. This study contributes to the literature by consolidating the use of human capital theory in the auditing domain and presenting new results that help clarify the relationship between human capital attributes and control environment evaluation. We have identified the human capital attributes of auditors that match a control environment evaluation based on all seven elements indicated by ISA 315.
Funder
Università Parthenope di Napoli
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Business and International Management
Reference113 articles.
1. Abdolmohammadi, M. J., Searfoss, D. G., & Shanteau, J. (2004). An investigation of the attributes of top industry audit specialists. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 16(1), 1–17.
2. Agoglia, C. P., Brown, K. F., & Hanno, D. M. (2003). Dickinson Technologies Inc: Assessing control environment and fraud risk. Issues in Accounting Education Teaching Notes, 18(1), 2–2.
3. Aldhizer, G. R., III, Miller, J. R., & Moraglio, J. F. (1995). Common attributes of quality audits. Journal of Accountancy, 179(1), 61.
4. Alissa, W., Capkun, V., Jeanjean, T., & Suca, N. (2014). An empirical investigation of the impact of audit and auditor characteristics on auditor performance. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 39(7), 495–510.
5. American Accounting Association Audit Section Education Committee. (2003). Challenges to audit education for the 21st Century: A survey of curricula, course content, and delivery methods. Issues in Accounting Education, 18(3), 241–263.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献