Abstract
AbstractThe article constructs a model of firm governance that considers the wider effects of economic activity, thus bridging the organisational level and the macro level. The theoretical framework builds on Hansmann’s ownership model and introduces an alternative. The “total cost model” advanced directs attention to concerns that are not entirely addressed by standard transaction cost theory and suggests that, when the external costs are high, a firm may need to extend the governance function to multiple patrons and absorb some external costs in pursuit of multiple public goals. Who should be included in the strategic control function will depend on the anticipated effects in terms of the external costs and the costs of organising. The article argues that this set-up helps to explain the “public organisation”, defined as a private organisation with public interest objectives, and further claims that this model helps to justify the recent emergence of multi-stakeholder social enterprises.
Funder
Università degli Studi di Trento
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Business and International Management
Reference102 articles.
1. Amable, B. (2011). Morals and politics in the ideology of neo-liberalism. Socio-Economic Review, 9(1), 3–30.
2. Aoki, M. (1984). The co-operative game theory of the firm. Clarendon: Oxford University Press.
3. Aoki, M. (2010). Corporations in evolving diversity: Cognition, governance, and institutions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4. Avelsson, M., & Willmott, H. (2002). Identity regulation as organizational control: Producing the appropriate individual. Journal of Management Studies, 39(5), 619–642.
5. Berle, A., & Means, G. (1932). The modern corporation and private property (10th ed.). New Brunswick (USA) and London (UK): Transaction Publishers.
Cited by
28 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献