Abstract
AbstractAs climate change increasingly challenges business models, the disclosure of firm environmental performance casts growing attention by corporate stakeholders. This creates wider opportunities and incentives for greenwash behaviors. We propose a novel set of measures to capture greenwashing and we investigate the association between greenwashing and corporate governance features that traditionally mitigate agency problems. We show that board characteristics are variously associated with the apparent degree of corporate greenwashing. Firms with more independent directors tend to greenwash more, the presence of female board directors seems to have a positive impact on the degree of greenwashing, while the effect of board size on greenwashing remains ambiguous. Importantly, we find that greenwashing reduces firm value.
Funder
Università degli Studi di Padova
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Business and International Management
Reference102 articles.
1. Adams, R., & Ferreira, D. (2009). Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 94(2), 291–309.
2. Aji, H., & Sutikno, B. (2015). The extended consequence of greenwashing: Perceived consumer skepticism. International Journal of Business and Information, 10(4), 433–468.
3. Aldy, J. E., & Gianfrate, G. (2019). Future-proof your climate strategy: Smart companies are putting their own price on carbon. Harvard Business Review, 97(3), 86–97.
4. Amato, L. H., & Amato, C. H. (2012). Environmental policy, rankings and stock values. Business, Strategy and the Environment, 21, 317–325. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.742
5. Ang, J. S., Cole, R. A., & Lin, J. W. (2000). Agency costs and ownership structure. The Journal of Finance, 55(1), 81–106.
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献