Abstract
AbstractWith the demand for elderly care increasing in many countries, digital technologies offer the potential for organising such care while also increasing value for money. However, public administrators need tools to make sense of their own complex environment and the possible impacts of new technologies. The current paper examines this issue by applying horizontal performance measurement, where practitioners can give financial value to issues that span across many functions and thus avoid sub-optimisation. We use an interventionist case study to illustrate a situation in which a Nordic city attempted to calculate the financial impact of introducing new digital technologies into elderly care. As our contribution to the literature on horizontal performance measurement, we show how economic (financial) and wellbeing anchors influence horizontal performance measurement in a healthcare digitalisation project. We also contribute to the development of our method theory, i.e., anchor practices, by providing evidence of the usage of multiple simultaneous anchors and make a methodological contribution by showing that interventionist researchers can support operationalising anchor practices.
Funder
Tekes
Tampere University including Tampere University Hospital, Tampere University of Applied Sciences
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Business and International Management
Reference110 articles.
1. Ahrens, T. (2018). Management controls that anchor other organizational practices. Contemporary Accounting Research, 35(1), 58–86.
2. Ahrens, T., Ferry, L., & Khalifa, R. (2020). Governmentality and counter-conduct: A field study of accounting amidst concurrent and competing rationales and programmes. Management Accounting Research, 48, 100686.
3. Adcroft, A., & Willis, R. (2005). The (un)intended outcome of public sector performance measurement. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 18(5), 386–400.
4. Almqvist, R., Grossi, G., van Helden, G. J., & Reichard, C. (2013). Public sector governance and accountability. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 24(7–8), 479–487.
5. Askedal, K., Flak, L. S., Solli-Sæther, H., & Straub, D. W. (2017). Organizational learning to leverage benefits realization management
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献