Abstract
AbstractInference on common parameters in panel data models with individual-specific fixed effects is a classic example of Neyman and Scott’s (Econometrica 36:1–32, 1948) incidental parameter problem (IPP). One solution to this IPP is functional differencing (Bonhomme in Econometrica 80(4):1337–1385, 2012), which works when the number of time periods T is fixed (and may be small), but this solution is not applicable to all panel data models of interest. Another solution, which applies to a larger class of models, is “large-T” bias correction [pioneered by Hahn and Kuersteiner (Econometrica 70(4):1639–1657, 2002) and Hahn and Newey (Econometrica 72(4):1295–1319, 2004)], but this is only guaranteed to work well when T is sufficiently large. This paper provides a unified approach that connects these two seemingly disparate solutions to the IPP. In doing so, we provide an approximate version of functional differencing, that is, an approximate solution to the IPP that is applicable to a large class of panel data models even when T is relatively small.
Funder
HORIZON EUROPE European Research Council
Flemish Research Council
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Reference43 articles.
1. Aguirregabiria V, Carro JM (2021) Identification of average marginal effects in fixed effects dynamic discrete choice models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.06141
2. Alvarez J, Arellano M (2003) The time series and cross-section asymptotics of dynamic panel data estimators. Econometrica 71(4):1121–1159
3. Andersen EB (1970) Asymptotic properties of conditional maximum-likelihood estimators. J R Stat Soc Ser B (Methodol) 32(2):283–301
4. Arellano M (2003) Discrete choices with panel data. Investig Econ 27(3):423–458
5. Arellano M, Bond S (1991) Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Rev Econ Stud 58(2):277–297