Abstract
AbstractEmpirical evidence in Dauth et al. (J Eur Econ Assoc, 2021) suggests that industrial robot adoption in Germany has led to a sectoral reallocation of employment from manufacturing to services, leaving total employment unaffected. We rationalize this evidence through the lens of a general equilibrium model with two sectors, matching frictions and endogenous participation. Automation induces firms to create fewer vacancies and job seekers to search less in the automatable sector (manufacturing). The service sector expands due to the sectoral complementarity in the production of the final good and a positive wealth effect for the household. Analysis across steady states shows that the reduction in manufacturing employment can be offset by the increase in service employment. The model can also replicate the magnitude of the decline in the ratio of manufacturing employment to service employment in Germany between 1994 and 2014.
Funder
Generalitat de Catalunya
Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Reference32 articles.
1. Daron Acemoglu, Pascual Restrepo (2018) The race between man and machine: implications of technology for growth, factor shares, and employment. Am Econ Rev 108(6):1488–1542
2. Daron Acemoglu, Pascual Restrepo (2020) Robots and jobs: evidence from US labor markets. J Political Econ 128(6):2188–2244
3. Anelli M, Colantone I, Stanig P (2020) We were the robots: automation and voting behavior in Western Europe No. 7758. CESifo Working Paper, 2019
4. Andrew Berg, Buffie Edward F, Luis-Felipe Zanna (2018) Should we fear the robot revolution? (The correct answer is yes). J Monet Econ 97:117–148
5. D Bergholt, F Furlanetto, NM Faccioli (2021) The decline of the labor share: new empirical evidence. Macroecon Am Econ J (forthcoming)
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献