Abstract
Abstract
Renewable energies are a major tool to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and combat climate change. Among renewables, solar parks are a key technology and their expansion will strongly increase in the future. Hence, there is a great need for research regarding their impact on biodiversity. In this study, we investigated the importance of three solar parks in northern Germany as habitat for carabid beetles. More specifically, we determined how habitat characteristics (temperature, vegetation structure), species richness, activity densities and carabid beetle assemblages vary between different locations within solar parks: areas under solar panels “UNDR”, gaps between panel rows “BTW” and areas at the edge of solar parks “EDGE”. We found that UNDR strongly differed from BTW/EDGE in terms of habitat conditions, species richness and activity densities of carabid beetles. UNDR mainly provided habitat for a species- and individual-poor subset of species already present in BTW/EDGE and made only a small contribution to the total species richness of the investigated solar parks. BTW and EDGE, on the other hand, differed only slightly. Thus, the narrow gaps between the panel rows were of similar importance as a habitat for carabid beetles as the edge areas. Overall, the investigated solar parks—and thus also the more species-rich areas EDGE and BTW—almost exclusively provided habitat for widespread and common non-threatened generalists, while species of conservation concern were extremely rare.
Implications for insect conservation
The low importance of UNDR for carabid beetles should be considered when assessing the biodiversity value of solar parks, since a large proportion of these facilities is covered with solar panels. Between panel rows and at the edge of solar parks, larger areas should be kept free from construction with solar panels in order to provide habitats for carabid beetles and other species groups. More research should be conducted on how to further improve solar parks for carabid beetles and overall biodiversity.
Funder
Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Universität Hannover
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference57 articles.
1. Agha M, Lovich JE, Ennen JR, Todd BD (2020) Wind, sun, and wildlife: do wind and solar energy development ‘short-circuit’conservation in the western United States? Environ Res Lett. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab8846
2. Armstrong A, Waldron S, Whitaker J, Ostle NJ (2014) Wind farm and solar park effects on plant–soil carbon cycling: uncertain impacts of changes in ground-level microclimate. Glob Change Biol 20:1699–1706. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12437
3. Armstrong A, Ostle NJ, Whitaker J (2016) Solar park microclimate and vegetation management effects on grassland carbon cycling. Environ Res Lett. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/7/074016
4. Assmann T, Dormann W, Främbs H et al (2003) Rote Liste der in Niedersachsen und Bremen gefährdeten Sandlaufkäfer und Laufkäfer (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae et Carabidae) mit Gesamtartenverzeichnis. Inform.d Naturschutz Niedersachs 23:70–95
5. Badelt O, Wiehe J, Haaren C von (2024) Harnessing energy abundance—sustainable expansion of ground mounted PV in Lower Saxony through harmonized spatial planning. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3188920/v1