Abstract
Abstract
Introduction
Eastern migratory monarch butterflies (Danaus plexippus) have declined over 80% in recent years, but little is known about fall reproduction in the southern U.S. where monarchs may compete with queen butterflies (Danaus gilippus).
Aims/methods
We provide data on the survival to third instar, associated arthropods, and phenology of fall breeding monarchs and queens in Texas.
Results
Monarch and queen survival was relatively high, but varied among years. Oleander aphids (Aphis nerii), spiders, and red imported fire ants (Solenopsis invicta) had minor negative effects on survival. The abundance of monarchs and queens on the study site peaked three to four weeks before the main passage of monarchs in the area. Queens had similar phenology and exhibited a migratory pattern similar to monarchs but on a smaller scale.
Discussion
Survival of fall monarchs is relatively high and potentially important for winter roost recruitment. Fall survival was not greatly affected by any particular arthropod taxon, but may be affected by precipitation. Fall reproduction is a response to available host plants and its timing enables pupae to eclose in time for migration to winter roosts.
Implications for insect conservation
Management of Asclepias viridis and other native milkweeds to facilitate fall reproduction could facilitate recovery of monarchs if it buffers variable productivity further north. Management should use mowing and burn schedules that promote high quality host plants. Populations of queens should be monitored for their potential to compete with monarchs especially in response to the potential impacts of parasite resistance and climate change.
Funder
Texas A and M University-Commerce
Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts, Economic Growth and Endangered Species Management Division
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Insect Science,Nature and Landscape Conservation,Animal Science and Zoology,Ecology
Reference97 articles.
1. Baker AM, Potter DA (2020) Invasive paper wasp turns urban pollinator gardens into ecological traps for monarch butterfly larvae. Sci Rep 10:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-66621-6
2. Barriga PA, Sternberg ED, Lefèvre T, de Roode JC, Altizer S (2016) Occurrence and host specificity of a neogregarine protozoan in four milkweed butterfly hosts (Danaus spp.). J Invertebr Pathol 140:75–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jip.2016.09.003
3. Batalden RV, Oberhauser KS (2015) Potential changes in eastern North American monarch migration in response to an introduced milkweed, Asclepias curassavica. In: Oberhauser KS, Nail KR, Altizer S (eds) Monarchs in a changing world: biology and conservation of an iconic insect. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, pp 215–224
4. Baum KA, Mueller EK (2015) Grassland and roadside management practices affect milkweed abundance and opportunities for monarch recruitment. In: Oberhauser KS, Nail KR, Altizer S (eds) Monarchs in a changing world: biology and conservation of an iconic butterfly. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, pp 197–202
5. Baum KA, Sharber WV (2012) Fire creates host plant patches for monarch butterflies. Biol Lett 8:968–971. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2012.0550
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献