Abstract
Abstract
As evidence for global insect population declines continues to amass, several studies have indicated that Orthoptera (grasshoppers, crickets, and katydids) are among the most threatened insect groups. Understanding Orthoptera populations across large spatial extents requires efficient survey protocols, however, many previously established methods are expensive and/or labor-intensive. One survey method widely employed in wildlife biology, the aural point count, may work well for crickets and katydids (suborder: Ensifera) because males produce conspicuous, species-specific mating calls. We conducted repeated point count surveys across an urban-to-rural gradient in central Pennsylvania. Occupancy analyses of ten focal species indicated that, although detection probability rates varied by species from 0.43 to 0.98, detection rates compounded over five visits such that all focal species achieved cumulative > 0.90. Factors associated with site occupancy varied among species with some positively associated with urbanization (e.g., Greater Anglewing, Microcentrum rhombifolium), some negatively associated with urbanization (e.g., Sword-bearing Conehead, Neoconocephalus ensiger), and others exhibiting constant occupancy across a habitat gradient (e.g., Common True Katydid, Pterophylla camellifolia). Our community-level analysis revealed that different species’ habitat associations interacted such that intermediate levels of urbanization (i.e., suburbs) hosted the highest number of species.
Implications for insect conservation
Ultimately, our analyses clearly support the concept that aural point counts paired with static occupancy modeling can serve as an important tool for monitoring night-singing Orthoptera populations. Applications of point count surveys by both researchers and citizen scientists may improve our understanding Ensifera populations and help in the global conservation of these threatened insects.
Funder
Penn State Insect Biodiversity Center
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Insect Science,Nature and Landscape Conservation,Animal Science and Zoology,Ecology
Reference94 articles.
1. Albright TA, McWilliams WH, Widmann RH, Butler BJ Crocker SJ, Kurtz CM, Lehman S, Shawn S, Lister TW, Miles R, Morin RS, Riemann R, Smith JE (2017) Pennsylvania forests 2014. Resour. Bull. NRS-111. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Pennsylvania
2. Alexander RD, Thomas ES (1959) Systematic and behavioral studies on the crickets of the Nemobius fasciatus group (Orthoptera: Gryllidae: Nemobiinae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 52:592–600
3. Alexander RD, Pace AE, Otte D (1972) The singing insects of Michigan. Great Lakes Entomol 5:33–69
4. Andrén H (1994) Effects of habitat fragmentation on birds and mammals in landscapes with different proportions of suitable habitat: a review. Oikos 71:355–366
5. Bailey WJ (1991) Acoustic behaviour of insects. An evolutionary perspective. Chapman and Hall Ltd, New York
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献