Understanding Lean—Statistical Analysis of Perceptions and Self-Deception Regarding Lean Management

Author:

Pearce AntonyORCID,Pons DirkORCID,Neitzert ThomasORCID

Abstract

AbstractDespite the benefits of a lean business system, many organisations struggle to implement and sustain lean initiatives. The purpose of this work was to explore in what way a leader’s deeper knowledge or different understandings of lean affects the lean implementation and its outcomes. The research methodology incorporated a survey of 757 participants. How respondents understood lean was assessed and later correlated to their extent of lean knowledge and specific understanding. This was supported by exploratory factor analysis and structural equation modelling. What caused participants to pursue lean knowledge was also assessed. Low lean knowledge and experience correlated with a system, tools and processes perspective of lean that was perceived to provide a low competitive advantage. Those of high lean knowledge had a much more holistic view of lean that encompassed both socio and technical aspects and also perceived greater competitive advantages from lean. Results showed 88% of people were (are) not at all familiar with lean, 9% of low knowledge and 3% of high knowledge. This paper promotes the importance of management knowledge in establishing a lean business system and exposes that many are actually self-deceived regarding their knowledge of lean. It identifies the need to develop lean education and recommends further research in this area. It also provides a conceptual framework for the implementation of lean with an emphasis on leadership learning. This paper contributes statistical evidence and a new perspective on the cause of lean success and failure.

Funder

Ministry of Science and Innovation, New Zealand

University of Canterbury

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Applied Mathematics,Control and Optimization,Computer Science Applications,Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)

Reference135 articles.

1. Baskaran SM, Lakshmanan AR (2019) A framework for lean readiness evaluation using a hierarchical fuzzy system. S Afr J Ind Eng 30:220–234. https://doi.org/10.7166/30-1-1988

2. Selko A (2012) Strategies to help manufacturers compete successfully. IndustryWeek. http://www.industryweek.com/companies-amp-executives/strategies-help-manufacturers-compete-successfully

3. Seth D, Gupta V (2005) Application of value stream mapping for lean operations and cycle time reduction: an Indian case study. Prod Plan Control 16:44–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537280512331325281

4. Holweg M (2007) The genealogy of lean production. J Oper Manag 25:420–437

5. Ohno T (1988) Toyota production system: beyond large-scale production. 1st Edition, Productivity Press

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3