Inhomogenous risk exposure in dual insurance system: selection effects in Germany’s long-term care plans

Author:

Neusius ThomasORCID

Abstract

AbstractLong-term care (LTC) gains attention in ageing societies. Making LTC insurance affordable for the wide public is a primary objective of politics and insurance companies alike. Germany’s LTC insurance, introduced 25 years ago, is split in two branches, a private and a public one. The per-capita claims diverge in the two systems. This study is dedicated to explain the difference in average claims seen in the German LTC system. Based on publicly available claims data, we decompose the contributions to the difference in claims and we quantify the advantage gained by the private LTC insurance through selection of low-risk enrollees. Furthermore, the study provides simulation results of the development of the claims’ differences over the next 40 years. In order to level off the claims differences, transfer payments from the private to the public LTC insurance have been suggested as a matter of fair risk sharing. However, it turns out that such a payment scheme does not necessarily work in favor of the public system troughout the next 40 years. Therefore, it seems unlikely that such a financial transfer is able to substantially ease the public LTC insurance’s financial burden.

Funder

Projekt DEAL

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference55 articles.

1. Arnold R, Rothgang H (2010) Finanzausgleich zwischen Sozialer Pflegeversicherung und Privater Pflegeversicherung. In: Göpffarth D, Greß S, Jacobs K, Wasem J (eds) Jahrbuch Risikostrukturausgleich 2009/2010. Von der Selektion zur Manipulation?. Medhochzwei, Heidelberg, pp 65–94

2. BaFin (2019). Wahrscheinlichkeitstafeln PKV 2018. https://www.bafin.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/DE/Anlage/dl_wahrscheinlichkeitstafeln_PKV_2018_va.zip. Accessed 03 Jul 2020

3. BAS (2020) GKV-Ausgabenprofile nach Alter, Geschlecht und Hauptleistungsbereichen, 1996–2018 (Stand: 15.01.2020). https://www.bundesamtsozialesicherung.de/fileadmin/redaktion/Risikostrukturausgleich/Datenzusammenstellung_und_Auswertung/20200401GKV_Altersausgabenprofile_1996-2018_20200115. xlsx. Accessed 04 Oct 2020

4. BMG KM6 (2018) Statistik über Versicherte, gegliedert nach Status, Alter, Wohnort und Kassenart (Stichtag: 1. Juli des jeweiligen Jahres). https://www.bundesgesundheitsministerium.de/fileadmin/Dateien/3_Downloads/Statistiken/GKV/Mitglieder_Versicherte/KM6_2018.xlsx. Accessed 04 Oct 2020

5. Breyer F (2018) Was spricht gegen Zwei–Klassen–Medizin? ZfWP 67(1):30–41

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Quo vadis Pflegeversicherung?;Gesundheitsökonomie & Qualitätsmanagement;2023-08-17

2. Steuerzuschuss für die Pflegeversicherung;Wirtschaftsdienst;2021-11

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3