Abstract
AbstractWe establish a benchmark result for the relationship between the loanable-funds and the money-creation approach to banking. In particular, we show that both processes yield the same allocations when there is no uncertainty. In such cases, using the much simpler loanable-funds approach as a shortcut does not imply any loss of generality. When there is aggregate risk with complete contracts and complete markets, we indicate that a restricted equivalence result holds.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference25 articles.
1. Clower R (1967) A reconsideration of the microfoundations of monetary theory. Western Econ J 6:1–9
2. Dubey P, Geanakoplos J (1992) The value of money in a finite-horizon economy: a role for banks. In: Dasgupta P, Gale D, Hart O, Maskin E (eds) Economic analysis of markets and games: essays in honor of Frank Hahn. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 407–444
3. Dubey P, Geanakoplos J (2003a) Inside and outside fiat money, gains to trade, and IS-LM. Econ Theory 21(2):347–397
4. Dubey P, Geanakoplos J (2003b) Monetary equilibrium with missing markets. J Math Econ 39(5–6):585–618
5. Dubey P, Geanakoplos J, Shubik M (2005) Default and punishment in general equilibrium. Econometrica 73(1):1–37
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Why Bank Money Creation?;SSRN Electronic Journal;2022