Abstract
AbstractA retrospective study based on cases of canine dirofilariosis presented to the University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna or diagnosed by private practitioners throughout Austria, from 1998 to 2018 was conducted to investigate the long-term development and current state of canine dirofilarial infections in Austria. Included in this study were 146 dogs which were tested positive for D. immitis and/or D. repens. The most commonly used diagnostic methods and the probable geographical origins of the infections were evaluated and the treatment protocols applied were compared with each other and with the literature. The results show that most infections were found due to screening for common travel infections using antigen-ELISA or PCR-testing, or by the incidental finding of microfilariae. Remarkably, only 24.3% of all cases presented showed clinical signs indicating canine dirofilariosis. Regarding the origin and travel history of the dogs, thirteen different countries could be identified. The three treatment protocols used showed a similar outcome after 8 months of treatment and minor side effects, which is consistent with the literature. An alarming increase in reported infections with both D. immitis and D. repens in Austria was noted since 2014. The number of documented cases had almost tripled by 2018, raising severe concerns about the threat of it becoming endemic in Austria. Therefore, the existing recommendations in current guidelines regarding canine dirofilariosis should be widely publicised and more strictly enforced. Prophylactic measures for dogs travelling abroad and diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for dogs imported from endemic countries should be obligatorily established throughout Europe, to reduce the risk of further spread of canine filarial infections to non-endemic regions.
Funder
University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Infectious Diseases,Insect Science,General Veterinary,General Medicine,Parasitology
Reference61 articles.
1. Albanese F, Abramo F, Braglia C, Caporali C, Venco L, Vercelli A, Chibaudo G, Leone F, Carrani F, Gianelli A, Otranto D (2013) Nodular lesions due to infestation by Dirofilaria repens in dogs from Italy. Vet Dermatol 24:255–e56
2. American Heartworm Society (2018) Current canine guidelines for the prevention, diagnosis and management of heartworm (Dirofilaria immitis) infection in dogs. https://d3ft8sckhnqim2.cloudfront.net/images/pdf/2018-AHS-Canine-Guidelines-181114.pdf?1542248135. Accessed 08 Aug 2019
3. Atkins CE (2003) Comparison of results of three commercial heartworm antigen test kits in dogs with low heartworm burdens. J Am Vet Med Assoc 222:1221–1223
4. Auer H, Susani M (2008) Der erste autochthone Fall einer subkutanen Dirofilariose in Österreich. Wien Klin Wochenschr 120:104–106
5. Bacsadi Á, Papp A, Szeredi L, Tóth G, Nemes C, Imre V, Tolnai Z, Széll Z, Sréter T (2016) Retrospective study on the distribution of Dirofilaria immitis in dogs in Hungary. Vet Parasitol 220:83–86
Cited by
19 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献