Abstract
AbstractGroup process assessment is one of the methodological challenges in computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL). The aim of this study is to analyze the group process dimensions in a problem-solving task with modular robotics in which creative components of fluidity, flexibility and innovation can be observed. The analysis of group process dimensions in relation to the creative components aims to understand the way group processes can support the creativity process in a problem-solving task. For this objective, 24 dyads of in-service teachers in a creative problem-solving task with modular robotics were engaged. The group process dimensions of conversation, social interaction and problem-solving was identified based on a CSCL coding schema developed for the Virtual Math Team environment. The creative components of fluidity, flexibility and innovation are operationalized based on Guilford’s Alternate Uses Test’s components. The results show the creative component of innovation is related to interactions of support within the dyad. Moreover, the participants dedicating more time to solve the task are engaged not only in more problem-solving interactions with their dyad but also in building more innovative figures, and they also make more figures together. Those results lead us to consider the importance of a positive emotional environment in the context of collaborative creation.
Funder
Agence Nationale de la Recherche
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Computer Science Applications,Education
Reference50 articles.
1. Aguilar Camaño, D., & Pifarre Turmo, M. (2019). Promoting social creativity in science education with digital technology to overcome inequalities: A scoping review. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1474.
2. Al-Dujaily, A., & Ryu, H. (2007). Personality and collaborative learning experience. In Seventh IEEE international conference on advanced learning technologies (ICALT 2007) (pp. 619–621). Niigata: IEEE.
3. Augusto, J. C., & Zhang, T. (2014). Workshop proceedings of the 10th international conference on intelligent environments. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
4. Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). The problem of speech genres. In C. Emerson & M. Holquist (Eds.), Speech genres and other late essay (pp. 60–102). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
5. Bandura, A. (1965). Vicarious processes: A case of no-trial learning. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 1–55). New York: Academic.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献