Who, what, where? The influence of the Integral Care Agreement (IZA) on established regional networks in Dutch healthcare

Author:

Peeters Robin,Westra Daan,Gifford Rachel,Ruwaard Dirk

Abstract

AbstractHealth and welfare organizations are encouraged to collaborate in regional, cross-domain networks. Although the literature has shown that policy changes can influence the effectiveness of existing networks, the impact of the Dutch Integral Care Agreement (Integraal ZorgAkkoord, IZA) is not yet known. We investigated this in a longitudinal qualitative case study of a network that has been in existence for a long time. The results show that after implementation of the IZA, a new overarching network at the healthcare administrative regional level was established. This led to uncertainty regarding the objective, composition, and sustainability of the existing network. A division emerged in the existing network between members who participated in the new network and those who did not. Organizations that participated in the new network questioned their participation in the existing network, to reduce administrative pressure. Organizations that only participated in the existing network doubted their participation because they lost sight of the network’s purpose and experienced a lack of transparency regarding decisions made in the new network. The Dutch national government and policymakers would do well to seek close alignment with practice when further developing the IZA.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference30 articles.

1. Rijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu (RIVM). Regio’s in beweging naar een toekomstbestendig gezondheidssysteem. Landelijke Monitor Proeftuinen – reflectie. op, Vol. 5. jaar proeftuinen. Bilthoven: RIVM; 2018.

2. De Taskforce. Rapport van de Taskforce. De juiste zorg op de juiste plek. wie durft? Den Haag: Rijksoverheid; 2018.

3. Nowell B, Kenis P. Purpose-oriented networks: the architecture of complexity. Perspect Public Manag Gov. 2019;2(3):169–73.

4. Burns LR, Nembhard IM, Shortell SM. Integrating network theory into the study of integrated healthcare. Soc Sci Med. 2022;296:114664.

5. Hearld LR, Westra D. Charting a course: a research agenda for studying the governance of healthcare networks. In: Shortell SM, Burns LR, Hefner JL, editors. Advances in Health Care Management Responding to the grand challenges in healthcare via organizational innovation: needed advances in management research. Leeds: Emerald Publishing Limited; 2023. pp. 111–32.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3