Abstract
AbstractThis study assesses three factors that influence the quantification of children’s and adolescents’ physical activity (PA) using accelerometers: selection of (1) non-wear algorithm, (2) epoch length and (3) cut-points. A total of 1525 participants from MoMo wave 3 (2018–2022), aged 6–17 years, wore GT3X accelerometers (ActiGraph, LLC, Pensacola, FL, USA) during waking hours. Acceleration counts were reintegrated into lengths of 1, 5, 15, 30, and 60 s epochs. Two non-wear time algorithms and two sets of cut-points were applied to each epoch length. Differences were found in both the comparison of the non-wear time algorithms and the comparison of the cut-points when the different epoch lengths were considered. This may result in large differences in estimated sedentary behavior and PA values. We propose to pool the data by merging and combining multiple accelerometer datasets from different studies and evaluate them in a harmonized way in the future. In addition to the need for future validation studies using short epoch lengths for young children, we also propose to conduct meta-analyses. This allows the use of data from multiple studies to validate cut-points and to propose a consensual set of cut-points that can be used in different settings and projects. The high discrepancy between results when comparing different epoch lengths has to be considered when interpreting accelerometer data and is regarded a confounding variable when comparing levels of PA between studies.
Funder
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Karlsruher Institut für Technologie (KIT)
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation,Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
Reference49 articles.
1. Aadland, E., & Nilsen, A. K. O. (2022). Accelerometer epoch length influence associations for physical activity intensities with body mass index and locomotor skills in young children. Journal of Sports Sciences, 40(14), 1568–1577.
2. Aadland, E., Andersen, L. B., Anderssen, S. A., & Resaland, G. K. (2018). A comparison of 10 accelerometer non-wear time criteria and logbooks in children. BMC Public Health, 18(1), 323. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5212-4.
3. Aadland, E., Andersen, L. B., Anderssen, S. A., Resaland, G. K., & Kvalheim, O. M. (2020). Accelerometer epoch setting is decisive for associations between physical activity and metabolic health in children. Journal of Sports Sciences, 38(3), 256–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2019.1693320.
4. ActiGraph (2020). What is the difference between the Wear Time Validation algorithms? https://actigraphcorp.my.site.com/support/s/article/What-is-the-difference-between-the-Wear-Time-Validation-algorithms. Accessed 16.12.2022
5. Arvidsson, D., Fridolfsson, J., Börjesson, M., Andersen, L. B., Ekblom, Ö., Dencker, M., & Brønd, J. C. (2019). Re-examination of accelerometer data processing and calibration for the assessment of physical activity intensity. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 29(10), 1442–1452. https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.13470.